Citation network
United States Vs. Shearer
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 27, 1985
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 52 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ShearerSearch
-
U.S. 52 (1985) United States v. ShearerSearch
-
summary judgment for the Government, but the Court of Appeals reversed, concluding, inter alia, that Feres v. UnitedSearch
-
in favor of the Government. The Court of Appeals reversed. 723 F.2d 1102 (CA3 1983). The court held that Feres v. UnitedSearch
-
bar respondent's claim against the Government. United States v. SpelarSearch
-
also supports our decision. In United States v. NeustadtSearch
-
covers cases in which negligence underlies the inaccurate representation. And in Kosak v. UnitedSearch
-
for negligently failing to prevent the intentional torts of a nonemployee under its supervision. See, e.g., Panella v. UnitedSearch
-
exclude claims arising from such intentional torts committed by Government employees. B Our holding in Feres v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 150 , 374 U. S. 162 (1963), quoting United States v. BrownSearch
-
as whether the suit requires the civilian court to second-guess military decisions, see Stencel Aero Engineering Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 673 (1977), and whether the suit might impair essential military discipline, see Chappell v. WallaceSearch
-
Respondent's case is therefore quite different from Brooks v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Stencel Aero Engineering Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
a serviceman, and whether and how to place restraints on a soldier's off-base conduct. But as we noted in Chappell v. WallaceSearch
-
U.S. at 462 U. S. 302 , quoting Gilligan v. MorganSearch
-
indeed, Feres itself was brought by an executrix. Feres v. UnitedSearch
-
Page 473 U. S. 60 JUSTICE MARSHALL, concurring in the judgment. While I am not a firm supporter of Feres v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ShearerSearch
-
Feres v. UnitedSearch
-
the Government. United States v. SpelarSearch
-
In United States v. NeustadtSearch
-
Kosak v. UnitedSearch
-
Panella v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. BrownSearch
-
Brooks v. UnitedSearch
-
Gilligan v. MorganSearch
-
of Feres v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial