Citation network
Marek Vs. Chesney
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 27, 1985
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 1 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Marek v. ChesneySearch
-
U.S. 1 (1985) Marek v. ChesneySearch
-
terms of the Rule to include in its judgment an additional amount which in its discretion, see Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSearch
-
Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. WildernessSearch
-
attorney's fees, we are satisfied such fees are to be included as costs for purposes of Rule 68. See, e.g., Fulps v. SpringfieldSearch
-
Waters v. HeubleinSearch
-
Scheriff v. BeckSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
F.Supp. 1254, 1259-1260 (Colo.1978). See also Delta Air Lies, Inc. v. AugustSearch
-
attorney's fees to prevailing parties. In Hensley v. EckerhartSearch
-
Rule 68. Califano v. YamasakiSearch
-
Respondent suggests that Roadway Express, In. v. PiperSearch
-
definition of costs that otherwise applies to the case. JUSTICE POWELL, concurring. In Delta Airlines, Inc. v. AugustSearch
-
Accordingly, I join the opinion of the Court. JUSTICE REHNQUIST, concurring. In Delta Airlines, Inc. v. AugustSearch
-
question has convinced me that this view was wrong, and I therefore join the opinion of THE CHIEF JUSTICE. Cf. McGrath v. KristensenSearch
-
of the civil rights laws, Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSearch
-
and as summarized in Alyeska Pipeline Co. v. WildernessSearch
-
construction, Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSearch
-
civil rights attorney's fee legislation. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSearch
-
As JUSTICE REHNQUIST, joined by THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Justice Stewart, cogently reasoned in Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSearch
-
as interpreted by Hensley v. EckerhartSearch
-
in litigation that will have far-reaching benefit to the public interest. Hensley v. EckerhartSearch
-
at issue in Ragan v. MerchantsSearch
-
Sibbach v. WilsonSearch
-
Hanna v. PlumerSearch
-
Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. WildernessSearch
-
of those rules, Sibbach v. WilsonSearch
-
refashioning of settlement incentives is squarely foreclosed by the Court's decision in Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. WildernessSearch
-
Sibbach v. WlsonSearch
-
Page 473 U. S. 44 are to be evaluated solely under the reasonableness standard as summarized in Hensley v. EckerhartSearch
-
are not subject to Rule 68, and instead are governed solely by the reasonableness standard as summarized in Hensley v. EckerhartSearch
-
p. 110 (4th ed.1984). See also United States v. Campos-SerranoSearch
-
United States v. BrownSearch
-
Cf. Harrison v. NorthernSearch
-
Rule 68 modifies the general cost-shifting provisions set forth in Rule 54(d). See Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSearch
-
application of the Rules, Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSearch
-
Ante at 473 U. S. 9 , citing Fulps v. SpringfieldSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Marek v. ChesneySearch
-
Fulps v. SpringfieldSearch
-
Delta Air Lies, Inc. v. AugustSearch
-
In Hensley v. EckerhartSearch
-
Roadway Express, In. v. PiperSearch
-
In Delta Airlines, Inc. v. AugustSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial