Citation network
Dowling Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 28, 1985
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
Dowling v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 473 U.S. 207 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Dowling v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 473 U.S. 207 (1985) Dowling v. UnitedSearch
-
the court relied on its decision in United States v. BelmontSearch
-
Liparota v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 471 U. S. 419 , 471 U. S. 424 (1985), citing United States v. HudsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
appropriate. See Williams v. UnitedSearch
-
Williams v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 458 U.S. at 458 U. S. 290 , quoting United States v. BassSearch
-
U. S. 336 , 404 U. S. 347 (1971), which in turn quotes United States v. UniversalSearch
-
required, of course, that the items stolen and transported remain in entirely unaltered form. See, e.g., United States v. MooreSearch
-
does it matter that the item owes a major portion of its value to an intangible component. See, e.g., United States v. SeagravesSearch
-
United States v. GreenwaldSearch
-
Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. NationSearch
-
Sony Corp. v. UniversalSearch
-
Wllliams v. UnitedSearch
-
in an area that normally would have been left to state law. United States v. TurleySearch
-
combat the problem of copyright infringement by the circuitous route hypothesized by the Government. See United States v. SmithSearch
-
more than 20 years of study, Congress adopted a comprehensive revision of the Copyright Act, see Mills Music, Inc. v. SnyderSearch
-
in the manner suggested. For example, in Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. NationSearch
-
United States v. GottesmanSearch
-
This factor militates strongly against the reading proffered by the Government. Cf. Williams v. UnitedSearch
-
cover petitioner Dowling's conduct, United States v. LacherSearch
-
States, 471 U.S. at 471 U. S. 427 , quoting Rewis v. UnitedSearch
-
naming him, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed in all respects. United States v. MinorSearch
-
of 1971, Pub.L. 92-140, 85 Stat. 391, and then only to sound recordings fixed after February 15, 1972. See Goldstein v. CaliforniaSearch
-
United States v. AthertonSearch
-
United States v. DrebinSearch
-
In United States v. SmithSearch
-
of infringing motion pictures and sound recordings comes within the statute, or assumed the same. See United States v. DrumSearch
-
United States v. WhetzelSearch
-
United States v. BerkwittSearch
-
United States v. GallantSearch
-
United States v. SamSearch
-
Goody, Inc., 506 F.Supp. 380, 385-391 (EDNY 1981) (sound recordings). See also United States v. SteerwellSearch
-
Cf. United States v. BottoneSearch
-
The dissent relies on United States v. TurleySearch
-
U. S. 407 (1957), and Morissette v. UnitedSearch
-
American Safety Table Co. v. SchreiberSearch
-
is broad Page 473 U. S. 230 enough to cover activities such as Dowling's. See, e.g., United States v. DrumSearch
-
F.Supp. 380, 385-391 (EDNY 1981). The only case cited by the Court that lends support to its holding is United States v. SmithSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial