Citation network
Cleburne Vs. Cleburne Living Ctr.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jul 01, 1985
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Cleburne v. CleburneSearch
-
Living Ctr. - 473 U.S. 432 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Cleburne v. CleburneSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Living Ctr., 473 U.S. 432 (1985) City of Cleburne, Texas v. CleburneSearch
-
which is essentially a direction that all persons similarly situated should be treated alike. Plyler v. DoeSearch
-
sustained if the classification drawn by the statute is rationally related to a legitimate state interest. Schweiker v. WilsonSearch
-
United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSearch
-
New Orleans v. DukesSearch
-
is at issue, the Equal Protection Clause allows the States wide latitude, United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSearch
-
scrutiny, and will be sustained only if they are suitably tailored to serve a compelling state interest. McLaughlin v. FloridaSearch
-
Graham v. RichardsonSearch
-
oversight by the courts is due when state laws impinge on personal rights protected by the Constitution. Kramer v. UnionSearch
-
Skinner v. OklahomaSearch
-
unless it is substantially related to a sufficiently important governmental interest. Mississippi University for Women v. HoganSearch
-
Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSearch
-
relationship to an asserted goal is so attenuated as to render the distinction arbitrary or irrational. See Zobel v. WilliamsSearch
-
course of adjudication, since it enables courts to avoid making unnecessarily broad constitutional judgments. Brockett v. SpokaneSearch
-
whole, whether by referendum or otherwise, could not order city action violative of the Equal Protection Clause, Lucas v. Forty-FourthSearch
-
its zoning powers to the owners of adjoining property. App. 105. Cf. Washington ex rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSearch
-
Retarded Citizens v. Macon-BibbSearch
-
units to those occupied by a single family, defined as no more than four unrelated persons. In Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSearch
-
Hendrick Hudson District Board of Education v. RowleySearch
-
In United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSearch
-
Commenting on the intermediate standard of review in his dissent in Craig v. BorenSearch
-
Cf. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSearch
-
See Lehr v. RobertsonSearch
-
Hampton v. MowSearch
-
U. S. 495 , 427 U. S. 520 -521 (1976) (STEVENS, J., dissenting). See also New York Transit Authority v. BeazerSearch
-
See Foley v. ConnelieSearch
-
See Mathews v. DiazSearch
-
Sugarman v. DougallSearch
-
U. S. 634 (1973), and In re Griffiths, 413 U. S. 717 (1973), with Ambach v. NorwickSearch
-
U. S. 68 (1979), and Foley v. ConnelieSearch
-
Compare Reed v. ReedSearch
-
U. S. 71 (1971), and Califano v. GoldfarbSearch
-
U. S. 199 (1977), with Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySearch
-
U. S. 256 (1979), and Heckler v. MathewsSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Cleburne v. CleburneSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial