Citation network
Thomas Vs. Arn
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 04, 1985
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 140 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Thomas v. ArnSearch
-
U.S. 140 (1985) Thomas v. ArnSearch
-
about her state of mind at the time of the shooting. The Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga County reversed. State v. ThomasSearch
-
App. 9. The Ohio Supreme Court, on discretionary review, reversed. State v. ThomasSearch
-
to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. See United States v. WaltersSearch
-
objections to the Magistrate's report. Id. at 815. The court relied upon its prior decision in United States v. WaltersSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
granted the petition for a writ of certiorari, 470 U.S. 1027 (1985), and we now affirm. II In United States v. WaltersSearch
-
Later opinions of the Sixth Circuit make it clear that the court views Walters in this way. See Patterson v. MintzesSearch
-
United States v. MartinSearch
-
has also shown that its rule is not jurisdictional by excusing the procedural default in a recent case. See Patterson v. MintzesSearch
-
that permit, at the least, the promulgation of procedural rules governing the management of litigation. Cf. Cuyler v. SullivanSearch
-
Barker v. WingoSearch
-
order or pay a filing fee established by a court of appeals, that court could certainly dismiss the appeal. Cf. Link v. WabashSearch
-
United States v. SchronceSearch
-
Lorin Corp. v. GotoSearch
-
b)(1)(A). See Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. FordSearch
-
in dealing with a caseload that was increasing far more rapidly than the number of judgeships. Mathews v. WeberSearch
-
Northern Pipeline Co. v. MarathonSearch
-
Pipe Line Co., 458 U. S. 50 , 458 U. S. 77 (1982) (plurality opinion), quoting Crowell v. BensonSearch
-
Logan v. ZimmermanSearch
-
ibid., quoting Armstrong v. ManzoSearch
-
In Ohio, the court's syllabus contains the controlling law. See Engle v. IsaacSearch
-
U. S. 107 , 456 U. S. 111 , n. 3 (1982), citing Haas v. StateSearch
-
have adopted waiver rules similar to the Sixth Circuit rule at issue in the present case. See Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. FordSearch
-
McCarthy v. MansonSearch
-
United State v. SchronceSearch
-
United States v. LewisSearch
-
Circuits have concluded that the failure to file objections waives only factual issues on the appeal. See Britt v. SimiSearch
-
Nettles v. WainwrightSearch
-
Lorin Corp. v. GotoSearch
-
The Courts of Appeals have often exercised that authority. See, e.g., Tingler v. MarshallSearch
-
United States v. FloreaSearch
-
United States v. SchiavoSearch
-
procedures for enjoining publication of in formation concerning criminal trial), cert. denied sub nom. Ditter v. PhiladelphiaSearch
-
see Walters, 638 F.2d at 950. See also McCarthy v. MansonSearch
-
Petitioner points to a passage in the House Report that quotes from Campbell v. UnitedSearch
-
The 1976 amendments were prompted by this Court's decision in Wingo v. WeddinSearch
-
the merits of an issue even though a procedural default relieved it of the duty to do so. See, e.g., Oklahoma City v. TuttleSearch
-
On Lee v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Thomas v. ArnSearch
-
State v. ThomasSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial