Citation network
Univ. of Michigan Vs. Ewing
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 12, 1985
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 214 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Univ. of Michigan v. EwingSearch
-
U.S. 214 (1985) Regents of the University of Michigan v. EwingSearch
-
Ewing v. BoardSearch
-
U.S. 1083 (1985). We now reverse. Page 474 U. S. 222 III In Board of Curators, Univ. of Mo. v. HorowitzSearch
-
Ashwander v. TVASearch
-
to demonstrate that the person or committee responsible did not actually exercise professional judgment. Cf. Youngberg v. RomeoSearch
-
that the Court has no license to invalidate legislation which it thinks merely arbitrary or unreasonable. Moore v. EastSearch
-
Keyishian v. BoardSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Board of Curators, Univ. of Mo. v. HorowitzSearch
-
immunized from liability for damages under the Eleventh Amendment, and dismissed this count of the complaint. Ewing v. BoardSearch
-
App. 13, a body corporate. Cf. Florida Dept. of Health v. FloridaSearch
-
in the District Court. Cf. Kentucky v. GrahamSearch
-
Ewing to name as defendants the individual members of the Board of Regents in their official capacities. See Patsy v. FloridaSearch
-
In Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
See Goss v. LopezSearch
-
U. S. 565 , 419 U. S. 572 -573 (1975). In a companion case, Perry v. SindermannSearch
-
could be independent sources of property interests. See Bishop v. WoodSearch
-
Booker v. GrandSearch
-
may operate to create property interests. Perry v. SindermannSearch
-
Id. at 408 U. S. 602 , n. 7 (quoting Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
to no state law entitlement to retake the NBME Part I. We rejected an argument similar to Ewing's in Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
Brief for Respondent in Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
however, we held that Dr. Roth had no property interest in the renewal of his teaching contract. Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
Propper v. ClarkSearch
-
U. S. 472 , 337 U. S. 486 -487 (1949). Accord, Haring v. ProsiseSearch
-
Leroy v. GreatSearch
-
Butner v. UnitedSearch
-
thrives not only on the independent and uninhibited exchange of ideas among teachers and students, see Keyishian v. BoardSearch
-
Sweezy v. NewSearch
-
and somewhat inconsistently, on autonomous decisionmaking by the academy itself, see University of California Regents v. BakkeSearch
-
of a university. University of California Regents v. BakkeSearch
-
U.S. at 438 U. S. 312 (opinion of POWELL, J.) (quoting Sweezy v. NewSearch
-
due process even though the interest is derived from state law, rather than the Constitution, Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
Moore v. EastSearch
-
Ibid., quoting Poe v. UllmanSearch
-
that have heretofore been accorded the protection of substantive due process. Cf. Harrah Independent School District v. MartinSearch
-
See Board of Curators, Univ. of Mo. v. HorowitzSearch
-
opinion of POWELL, J.), cited ante at 474 U. S. 225 , n. 11. See also University of California Regents v. BakkeSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Univ. of Michigan v. EwingSearch
-
Regents of the University of Michigan v. EwingSearch
-
III In Board of Curators, Univ. of Mo. v. HorowitzSearch
-
Cf. Youngberg v. RomeoSearch
-
Cf. Florida Dept. of Health v. FloridaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial