Citation network
ins Vs. Phinpathya
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 10, 1984
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 183 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court INS v. PhinpathyaSearch
-
U.S. 183 (1984) Immigration and Naturalization Service v. PhinpathyaSearch
-
requirement. Rosenberg v. FleutiSearch
-
Id. at 1018, and n. 6 (citing Kamheangpatiyooth v. INSSearch
-
U. S. 63 , 456 U. S. 68 (1982), quoting Reiter v. SonotoneSearch
-
Corp., 442 U. S. 330 , 442 U. S. 337 (1979), and Richards v. UnitedSearch
-
McColvin v. INSSearch
-
no discretion in ordering deportation, and an alien's sole remedy was to obtain a private bill from Congress. See INS v. JongSearch
-
notwithstanding the statute's plain language and history. Brief for Respondent 10 (quoting Kamheangpatiyooth v. INSSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
and n. 3). She argues that the Court of Appeals' construction is in keeping both with our decision in Rosenberg v. FleutiSearch
-
construe the Act to broaden the Attorney General's discretion is fundamentally inconsistent with this intent. In INS v. JongSearch
-
was first articulated in Kamheangpatiyooth, which reaffirmed the Court of Appeals' earlier ruling in Wadman v. INSSearch
-
CA9 1964). See 597 F.2d at 1256. Wadman held that the principles established by this Court in Rosenberg v. FleutiSearch
-
INS v. JongSearch
-
may properly be determined in an exclusion, as well as a deportation, hearing. See Landon v. PlasenciaSearch
-
In INS v. JongSearch
-
Velez v. INSSearch
-
Heitland v. INSSearch
-
the Ninth Circuit's decision in 1964 in Wadman v. INSSearch
-
a)(1), ante this page, and further, that our decision in Rosenberg v. FleutiSearch
-
absences far different from the one at issue in this case -- for example, a short vacation in Mexico, see Wadman v. INSSearch
-
F.2d 812 (CA9 1964), an inadvertent train ride through Canada while en route from Buffalo to Detroit, see Di Pasquale v. KarnuthSearch
-
Wall. 482, 74 U. S. 486 -487 (1869). See also Helvering v. HammelSearch
-
was not intended to be interpreted literally. McLeod v. PetersonSearch
-
and to have adopted that interpretation for purposes of the new law. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSearch
-
heavily upon authoritative statements by proponents of bills in our search for the meaning of legislation. Lewis v. UnitedSearch
-
FEA v. AlgonqinSearch
-
a)(1), the INS should remain free to apply the requirement flexibly, unconstrained by any limitation Rosenberg v. PageSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court INS v. PhinpathyaSearch
-
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. PhinpathyaSearch
-
Kamheangpatiyooth v. INSSearch
-
Reiter v. SonotoneSearch
-
and Richards v. UnitedSearch
-
Congress. See INS v. JongSearch
-
Wadman v. INSSearch
-
See Landon v. PlasenciaSearch
-
Di Pasquale v. KarnuthSearch
-
Helvering v. HammelSearch
-
McLeod v. PetersonSearch
-
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSearch
-
Lewis v. UnitedSearch
-
Rosenberg v. PageSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial