Citation network
Mckaskle Vs. Wiggins
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 23, 1984
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 168 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court McKaskle v. WigginsSearch
-
U.S. 168 (1984) McKaskle v. WigginsSearch
-
claiming that standby counsel's conduct deprived him of his right to present his own defense, as guaranteed by Faretta v. CaliforniaSearch
-
joined, post, p. 465 U. S. 188 . JUSTICE O'CONNOR delivered the opinion of the Court. In Faretta v. CaliforniaSearch
-
The District Court denied the habeas petition, but the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed. Wiggins v. EstelleSearch
-
the accused in the event that termination of the defendant's self-representation is necessary. See United States v. DoughertySearch
-
the courts have recognized that a defendant has a right to be present at all important stages of trial, Snyder v. MassachusettsSearch
-
U. S. 97 (1934), that he may not normally be forced to appear in court in shackles or prison garb, Estelle v. WilliamsSearch
-
and that he has a right to present testimony Page 465 U. S. 179 in his own behalf, see Harris v. NewSearch
-
the claims presented by a pro se defendant from those presented by standby counsel. Cf. United States v. MartinezSearch
-
United States v. PenickSearch
-
United States v. ReevesSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
was counsel's position adopted over Wiggins' on a matter that would normally be left to the defense's discretion. v. ParticipationSearch
-
Higgins v. StateSearch
-
and Snow v. StateSearch
-
in a trial of more than one defendant, or from an amicus counsel appointed to assist the court, see Brown v. UnitedSearch
-
this second requirement. In its footnote on standby counsel Faretta cited three pages of United States v. DoughertySearch
-
Adams v. UnitedSearch
-
States ex rel. McCann, 317 U. S. 269 , 317 U. S. 279 (1942), and to manage one's own defense. Faretta v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Wiggins v. EstelleSearch
-
opinion ignores Faretta's emphasis on the defendant's own perception of the criminal justice system, Faretta v. CaliforniaSearch
-
undermined Wiggins' perception that he controlled his own fate, Faretta v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Chapman v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 553 F.2d 886, 891 (CA5 1977) (footnote omitted). See Moreno v. EstelleSearch
-
Bittaker v. EnomotoSearch
-
United States v. DoughertySearch
-
United States v. PlattnerSearch
-
People v. TynerSearch
-
Cal.App.3d 352, 356, 143 Cal.Rptr. 52, 54 (1977). But see People v. SharpSearch
-
Burney v. StateSearch
-
State v. KirbySearch
-
Neb. 646, 648-649, 254 N.W.2d 424, 426 (1977). See also Walker v. LogginsSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court McKaskle v. WigginsSearch
-
of the Court. In Faretta v. CaliforniaSearch
-
See United States v. DoughertySearch
-
Snyder v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Estelle v. WilliamsSearch
-
Harris v. NewSearch
-
Cf. United States v. MartinezSearch
-
Higgins v. StateSearch
-
Brown v. UnitedSearch
-
of United States v. DoughertySearch
-
See Moreno v. EstelleSearch
-
People v. SharpSearch
-
Walker v. LogginsSearch
-
Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial