Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Antone Vs. Dugger

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 25, 1984

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

33 entries 1 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. Ross Vs. Moffitt US Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1974
  2. U.S. 200 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court Antone v. Dugger
    Search
  3. U.S. 200 (1984) Antone v. Dugger
    Search
  4. one of the prosecution witnesses had violated applicant's due process Page 465 U. S. 202 rights under Brady v. Maryland
    Search
  5. U. S. 83 (1963), and United States v. Agurs
    Search
  6. U. S. 97 (1976). Antone v. State
    Search
  7. found that there was no violation. On the second appeal, the Florida Supreme Court affirmed the conviction. Antone v. State
    Search
  8. Florida Supreme Court's use of extra-record materials in conducting proportionality review of death sentences. Brown v. Wainwright
    Search
  9. So.2d 1327 (1981), cert. denied, 454 U. S. 1000 (1981). (This practice was also challenged in Ford v. Strickland
    Search
  10. ineffective assistance of counsel, further Brady violations, and challenges to applicant's arrest under Payton v. New
    Search
  11. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied relief, and the Florida Supreme Court affirmed. Antone v. Strickland
    Search
  12. of applicant's claims. On remand, the District Court again denied relief, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Antone v. Strickland
    Search
  13. at the penalty stage of his trial and unconstitutionality of the Florida death penalty statute under Lockett v. Ohio
    Search
  14. Court denied the petition, again noting that applicant's claim previously had been considered by the court in Brown v. Wainwright
    Search
  15. supra, and by the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Antone v. Strickland
    Search
  16. applicant was sentenced unconstitutionally excluded nonstatutory mitigating factors from consideration, see Lockett v. Ohio
    Search
  17. that this haste denied him his right to counsel in postconviction proceedings and refers us in particular to Ross v. Moffitt
    Search
  18. U. S. 600 (1974), and Powell v. Alabama
    Search
  19. U. S. 45 (1932). Ross v. Moffitt
    Search
  20. was acted upon on January 29, 1981, was listed as applicant's counsel in the petition for writ of certiorari in Brown v. Wainwright
    Search
  21. the essence of each of petitioner's current claims was raised in an earlier federal habeas corpus proceeding. Antone v. Strickland
    Search
  22. penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia
    Search
  23. U.S. Supreme Court Antone v. Dugger
    Search
  24. Brady v. Maryland
    Search
  25. and United States v. Agurs
    Search
  26. Antone v. State
    Search
  27. Brown v. Wainwright
    Search
  28. Ford v. Strickland
    Search
  29. Payton v. New
    Search
  30. Antone v. Strickland
    Search
  31. Lockett v. Ohio
    Search
  32. and Powell v. Alabama
    Search
  33. the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial