Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Grove City Coll. Vs. Bell

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 28, 1984

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

54 entries 3 linked 51 unlinked
Show
  1. Committee for Public Education Vs. Nyquist US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1973
  2. Norwood Vs. Harrison US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1973
  3. Blum Vs. Yaretsky US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1982
  4. U.S. 555 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court Grove City Coll. v. Bell
    Search
  5. U.S. 555 (1984) Grove City College v. Bell
    Search
  6. terminate the students' aid because of the College's refusal to execute an Assurance of Compliance. Grove City College v. Harris
    Search
  7. federal aid or receive checks directly from the Federal Government are subject to regulation. Cf. Bob Jones University v. Johnson
    Search
  8. North Haven Board of Education v. Bell
    Search
  9. U. S. 512 , 456 U. S. 521 (1982) (quoting United States v. Price
    Search
  10. of Congress' intent. The economic effect of direct and indirect assistance often is indistinguishable, see Mueller v. Allen
    Search
  11. et seq. (1976 ed. and Supp. V). Cannon v. University
    Search
  12. have twice recognized the probative value of Title IX's unique postenactment history, North Haven Board of Education v. Bell
    Search
  13. Cannon v. University
    Search
  14. failure to disapprove the regulations is not dispositive, but, as we recognized in North Haven Board of Education v. Bell
    Search
  15. An analysis of Title IX's language and legislative history led us to conclude in North Haven Board of Education v. Bell
    Search
  16. emphasis added). These regulations, like those at issue in North Haven Board of Education v. Bell
    Search
  17. Supp., Jan. 1, 1965), and upheld, Gardner v. Alabama
    Search
  18. assurance that it will conduct the aided program or activity in accordance with Title IX and the applicable regulations. v. Grove
    Search
  19. assistance that educational institutions are not obligated to accept. E.g., Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman
    Search
  20. somewhat from the version quoted in the text. See App. to Brief for Federal Respondents in Hillsdale College v. Department
    Search
  21. As the Court of Appeals recognized, we have since upheld the validity of Subpart E. North Haven Board of Education v. Bell
    Search
  22. as did the version in force when Title IX was enacted. 45 CFR pt. 80, Appendix A (1972). See Bob Jones University v. Johnson
    Search
  23. and the actions taken by Congress pursuant to it were more completely summarized in North Haven Board of Education v. Bell
    Search
  24. Grove City College v. Harris
    Search
  25. record in this case is far from adequate to decide the question raised in 465 U. S. See Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Darrone
    Search
  26. speculate about hypothetical cases, why not consider a school comparable to the private institutions discussed in Blum v. Yaretsky
    Search
  27. The Court has twice before had occasion to ascertain the precise scope of Title IX. See North Haven Board of Education v. Bell
    Search
  28. U.S. at 456 U. S. 521 (quoting United States v. Price
    Search
  29. guidelines, while noting the broad purposes underlying the prohibitory section of Title VI. United States v. Jefferson
    Search
  30. Bossier Parish School Board v. Lemon
    Search
  31. Ibid. Finally, in Board of Public Instruction v. Finch
    Search
  32. L.J. 325, 344-345 (1966) (supporting Department's treatment of a school district as an individual program). Cf. Lau v. Nichols
    Search
  33. See also Brief for Council of Collegiate Women Athletic Administrators as Amicus Curiae 4-16. Cf. Haffer v. Temple
    Search
  34. The Secretary specifically cited and quoted from Bob Jones University v. Johnson
    Search
  35. U.S. Supreme Court Grove City Coll. v. Bell
    Search
  36. Grove City College v. Bell
    Search
  37. Assurance of Compliance. Grove City College v. Harris
    Search
  38. Cf. Bob Jones University v. Johnson
    Search
  39. Mueller v. Allen
    Search
  40. Public Education v. Nyquist
    Search
  41. and Supp. V). Cannon v. University
    Search
  42. Gardner v. Alabama
    Search
  43. E.g., Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman
    Search
  44. Hillsdale College v. Department
    Search
  45. of Subpart E. North Haven Board of Education v. Bell
    Search
  46. See Bob Jones University v. Johnson
    Search
  47. U. S. See Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Darrone
    Search
  48. of Title IX. See North Haven Board of Education v. Bell
    Search
  49. of Title VI. United States v. Jefferson
    Search
  50. Board of Public Instruction v. Finch
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial