Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Lynch Vs. Donnelly

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 05, 1984

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

62 entries 10 linked 52 unlinked
Show
  1. Zorach Vs. Clauson US Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1952
  2. Epperson Vs. Arkansas US Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1968
  3. Engel Vs. Vitale US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1962
  4. Board of Education Vs. Allen US Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1968
  5. Marsh Vs. Chambers US Supreme Court · Jul 05, 1983
    Relied / Followed
  6. Meek Vs. Pittenger US Supreme Court · May 19, 1975
  7. Tilton Vs. Richardson US Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1971
  8. Larson Vs. Valente US Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1982
  9. Stone Vs. Graham US Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1980
  10. Widmar Vs. Vincent US Supreme Court · Dec 08, 1981
  11. U.S. 668 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court Lynch v. Donnelly
    Search
  12. U.S. 668 (1984) Lynch v. Donnelly
    Search
  13. between church and state, see, e.g., Everson v. Board
    Search
  14. Public Education & Religious Liberty v. Nyquist
    Search
  15. mandates accommodation, not merely tolerance, of all religions, and forbids hostility toward any. See, e.g., Zorach v. Clauson
    Search
  16. McCollum v. Board
    Search
  17. for submission to the states, it enacted legislation providing for paid Chaplains for the House and Senate. In Marsh v. Chambers
    Search
  18. Myers v. United
    Search
  19. supra, at 343 U. S. 313 . See also Abington School District v. Schempp
    Search
  20. Walz v. Tax
    Search
  21. emphasized our unwillingness to be confined to any single test or criterion in this sensitive area. See, e.g., Tilton v. Richardson
    Search
  22. We did not, for example, consider that analysis relevant in Marsh v. Chambers
    Search
  23. U. S. 783 (1983). Nor did we find Lemon useful in Larson v. Valente
    Search
  24. In this case, the focus of our inquiry must be on the creche in the context of the Christmas season. See, e.g., Stone v. Graham
    Search
  25. Abington School District v. Schempp
    Search
  26. there was no question that the statute or activity was motivated wholly by religious considerations. See, e.g., Stone v. Graham
    Search
  27. U. S. 421 , 370 U. S. 424 -425 (1962). Even where the benefits to religion were substantial, as in Everson v. Board
    Search
  28. and Tilton, supra, we saw a secular purpose and no conflict with the Establishment Clause. Cf. Larkin v. Grendel's
    Search
  29. the display depicts the historical origins of this traditional event long recognized as a National Holiday. See Allen v. Hickel
    Search
  30. Separation of Church and State v. City
    Search
  31. money for textbooks supplied throughout the country to students attending church-sponsored schools, Board of Education v. Allen
    Search
  32. of public funds for transportation of Page 465 U. S. 682 students to church-sponsored schools, Everson v. Board
    Search
  33. buildings of church-sponsored institutions of higher education combining secular and religious education, Tilton v. Richardson
    Search
  34. noncategorical grants to church-sponsored colleges and universities, Roemer v. Board
    Search
  35. and the tax exemptions for church properties sanctioned in Walz v. Tax
    Search
  36. also require that we view it as more of an endorsement of religion than the Sunday Closing Laws upheld in McGowan v. Maryland
    Search
  37. the release time program for religious training in Zorach v. Clauson
    Search
  38. and the legislative prayers upheld in Marsh v. Chambers
    Search
  39. See McGowan, supra, at 366 U. S. 442 . This case differs significantly from Larkin v. Grendel's
    Search
  40. Widmar v. Vincent
    Search
  41. other religious institutions, and hence no inquiry into potential political divisiveness is even called for, Mueller v. Allen
    Search
  42. cases in which we found no conflict with the Establishment Page 465 U. S. 686 Clause. See, e.g., McGowan v. Maryland
    Search
  43. of government. Any notion that these symbols pose a real danger of establishment of a state church is farfetched indeed. v. That
    Search
  44. striking down statutes or programs as violative of the Establishment Clause. See, e.g., Illinois ex rel. McCollum v. Board
    Search
  45. Levitt v. Committee
    Search
  46. Committee Page 465 U. S. 687 for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. Nyquist
    Search
  47. and Stone v. Graham
    Search
  48. granting to a church a virtual veto power over the licensing of liquor establishments near the church. Larkin v. Grendel's
    Search
  49. See Reynolds v. United
    Search
  50. U.S. Supreme Court Lynch v. Donnelly
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial