Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Jacobsen

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 02, 1984

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

59 entries 13 linked 46 unlinked
Show
  1. Burdeau Vs. Mcdowell US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1921
  2. United States Vs. Knotts US Supreme Court · Mar 02, 1983
  3. Terry Vs. Ohio US Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1968
  4. Hale Vs. Henkel US Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1906
  5. Reid Vs. Georgia US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1980
  6. United States Vs. Mendenhall US Supreme Court · May 27, 1980
  7. United States Vs. Brignoni-ponce US Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1975
  8. Cupp Vs. Murphy US Supreme Court · May 29, 1973
  9. United States Vs. Janis US Supreme Court · Jul 06, 1976
  10. United States Vs. Chadwick US Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1977
  11. Robbins Vs. California US Supreme Court · Jul 01, 1981
  12. Arkansas Vs. Sanders US Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1979
  13. United States Vs. Place US Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1983
  14. U.S. 109 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Jacobsen
    Search
  15. U.S. 109 (1984) United States v. Jacobsen
    Search
  16. fact, compromises no legitimate privacy interest. United States v. Place
    Search
  17. recognized, its decision conflicted with a decision of another Court of Appeals on comparable facts, United States v. Barry
    Search
  18. Walter v. Page
    Search
  19. to which they exceeded the scope of the private search. That standard was adopted by a majority of the Court in Walter v. United
    Search
  20. J., dissenting, joined by BURGER, C.J., and POWELL and REHNQUIST, JJ.) (footnote omitted) (quoting United States v. Sanders
    Search
  21. United States v. Miller
    Search
  22. freely made available for his inspection did not violate the Fourth Amendment. Page 466 U. S. 120 See Coolidge v. New
    Search
  23. Texas v. Brown
    Search
  24. or the hypothetical gun case in Arkansas v. Sanders
    Search
  25. expectation that his associates would not disclose confidential information to the authorities. See United States v. White
    Search
  26. This conclusion is dictated by United States v. Place
    Search
  27. could, at most, have only a de minimis impact on any protected property interest. Cf. Cardwell v. Lewis
    Search
  28. Spinelli v. United
    Search
  29. States, 393 U. S. 410 , 393 U. S. 413 , n. 3 (1969) (emphasis in original) (quoting Aguilar v. Texas
    Search
  30. U. S. 108 , 378 U. S. 109 , n. 1 (1964)). See Illinois v. Gates
    Search
  31. People v. Adler
    Search
  32. United States v. Andrews
    Search
  33. See Illinois v. Andreas
    Search
  34. Smith v. Maryland
    Search
  35. See United States v. Place
    Search
  36. United States v. Chadwick
    Search
  37. the Fourth Amendment -- meaningful interference, however brief, with an individual's freedom of movement. See Michigan v. Summers
    Search
  38. Brown v. Texas
    Search
  39. Davis v. Mississippi
    Search
  40. Coolidge v. New
    Search
  41. United States v. Van
    Search
  42. United States v. Place
    Search
  43. See Whiteley v. Warden
    Search
  44. Wong Sun v. United
    Search
  45. Rios v. United
    Search
  46. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Jacobsen
    Search
  47. United States v. Barry
    Search
  48. Walter v. United
    Search
  49. United States v. Sanders
    Search
  50. See Coolidge v. New
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial