Citation network
Eeoc Vs. Shell Oil Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 02, 1984
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
EEOC v. ShellSearch
-
Oil Co. - 466 U.S. 54 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court EEOC v. ShellSearch
-
Oil Co., 466 U.S. 54 (1984) EEOC v. ShellSearch
-
Ibid. (quoting EEOC v. K-MartSearch
-
that enables the Commission to detect and remedy instances of discrimination. See Occidental Life Insurance Co. v. EEOCSearch
-
Until rescinded, this rule is binding on the Commission as well as complainants. See United States v. NixonSearch
-
that the Commission, before filing suit, attempt to resolve disputes through conciliation. See Ford Motor Co. v. EEOCSearch
-
ensure that documents pertaining to allegations of discrimination are not destroyed. See Occidental Life Insurance Co. v. EEOCSearch
-
but that, in view of the recent decision of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in EEOC v. DeanSearch
-
Eeoc V. K-MartSearch
-
EEOC v. BaySearch
-
EEOC v. DeanSearch
-
applied to aggrieved parties as well as Commissioners. See Rogers v. EEOCSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Graniteville Co. (Sibley Division) v. EEOCSearch
-
Sheet Metal Workers v. EEOCSearch
-
The same conclusion has been reached by all of the Courts of Appeals that have considered the matter. See EEOC v. K-MartSearch
-
EEOC v. AppalachianSearch
-
EEOC v. ContainerSearch
-
prejudice to the employer, the result is not to bar a subsequent suit either by the aggrieved party, see, e.g., Smith v. AmericanSearch
-
President Lines, Ltd., 571 F.2d 102, 107, n. 8 (CA2 1978), or by the Commission, see EEOC v. BurlingtonSearch
-
EEOC v. AirguideSearch
-
Blue Bell Boots, Inc. v. EEOCSearch
-
F.2d at 243 (information regarding pre-1965 practices is relevant to an EEOC inquiry). Cf. United States v. ArthurSearch
-
See EEOC v. AssociatedSearch
-
Cong.Rec. 14189 (1964) (remarks of Sen. Pastore), and in the case law, see, e.g., Local No. 104, Sheet Metal Workers v. EEOCSearch
-
practices will result in a workforce in which minorities and women are underrepresented. See Hazelwood School Dist. v. UnitedSearch
-
that the demand for information is too indefinite or has been made for an illegitimate purpose. See United States v. PowellSearch
-
See Chromcraft Corp. v. EEOCSearch
-
which reflects its interpretation of its statutory obligations, is entitled to deference. See Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSearch
-
Griggs v. DukeSearch
-
Cf. FTC v. StandardSearch
-
or practice discrimination charges, which need not involve intentional or knowing misconduct. See, e.g., Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
of the statutory notice requirement while it enforces the EEOC's investigative subpoena. The Court's decision in FTC v. StandardSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court EEOC v. ShellSearch
-
See Occidental Life Insurance Co. v. EEOCSearch
-
See United States v. NixonSearch
-
See Ford Motor Co. v. EEOCSearch
-
Commissioners. See Rogers v. EEOCSearch
-
See EEOC v. K-MartSearch
-
Smith v. AmericanSearch
-
EEOC v. BurlingtonSearch
-
Blue Bell Boots, Inc. v. EEOCSearch
-
Cf. United States v. ArthurSearch
-
See Hazelwood School Dist. v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. PowellSearch
-
See Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSearch
-
Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
FTC v. StandardSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial