Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

ins Vs. Delgado

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 17, 1984

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

58 entries 9 linked 49 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Martinez-fuerte US Supreme Court · Jul 06, 1976
  2. Terry Vs. Ohio US Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1968
  3. United States Vs. Brignoni-ponce US Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1975
  4. United States Vs. Mendenhall US Supreme Court · May 27, 1980
  5. Florida Vs. Royer US Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1983
  6. United States Vs. Cortez US Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1981
  7. Ybarra Vs. Illinois US Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1979
  8. Fiallo Vs. Bell US Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1977
  9. Allee Vs. Medrano US Supreme Court · May 20, 1974
    Relied / Followed
  10. U.S. 210 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court INS v. Delgado
    Search
  11. U.S. 210 (1984) Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Delgado
    Search
  12. that the employee to be questioned was an illegal alien. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, AFL-CIO v. Sureck
    Search
  13. by an INS agent during one of the factory surveys. Id. at 46a. Reasoning from this Court's decision in Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  14. The Court of Appeals reversed. Applying the standard first enunciated by a Member of this Court in United States v. Mendenhall
    Search
  15. F.2d at 634 (quoting United States v. Anderson
    Search
  16. enforcement of the immigration laws and presents a conflict with the decision reached by the Third Circuit in Babula v. INS
    Search
  17. While applying such a test is relatively straightforward in a situation resembling a traditional arrest, see Dunaway v. New
    Search
  18. Florida v. Royer
    Search
  19. at 460 U. S. 523 , n. 3 (opinion of REHNQUIST, J.). In contrast, a much different situation prevailed in Brown v. Texas
    Search
  20. being told they are free not to respond, hardly eliminates the consensual nature of the response. Cf. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
    Search
  21. U. S. 217 some minimal level of objective justification to validate the detention or seizure. United States v. Mendenhall
    Search
  22. Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  23. us that the encounters were classic consensual encounters, rather than Fourth Amendment seizures. See Florida v. Royer
    Search
  24. policy which violated the Fourth Amendment and which will be applied to their workplace in the future. Cf. Allee v. Medrano
    Search
  25. basis on which to conclude that respondents have shown an INS policy entitling them to injunctive relief. See Rizzo v. Goode
    Search
  26. Allee v. Medrano
    Search
  27. Hague v. CIO
    Search
  28. that my have taken place was permissible under the reasoning of our decision in United States v. Martinez-Fuerte
    Search
  29. We have noted before the dimensions of the immigration problem in this country. E.g., United States v. Brignoni-Ponce
    Search
  30. by law enforcement officers may amount to a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. See, e.g., Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  31. Davis v. Mississippi
    Search
  32. Adams v. Williams
    Search
  33. Brown v. Texas
    Search
  34. the years with some clarity. Page 466 U. S. 227 The Court launched its examination of this issue in Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  35. even in encounters with the police that fall short of full arrest -- has been consistently reaffirmed. In Davis v. Mississippi
    Search
  36. Id. at 394 U. S. 727 , n. 6. Similarly, in Brown v. Texas
    Search
  37. was joined at the time by only one other Member of this Court, Part II-A of Justice Stewart's opinion in United States v. Mendenhall
    Search
  38. the boundary separating merely consensual encounters from forcible stops to investigate a suspected crime. See Florida v. Royer
    Search
  39. they have reasonable grounds for suspecting that the person is involved in some unlawful activity. In United States v. Brignoni-Ponce
    Search
  40. Id. at 422 U. S. 884 . See also Michigan v. Summers
    Search
  41. Delaware Page 466 U. S. 233 v. Prouse
    Search
  42. Congress, of course, possesses broad power to regulate the admission and exclusion of aliens, see Kliendeinst v. Mandel
    Search
  43. both American citizens and lawful resident aliens, who are also protected by the Fourth Amendment, see Almeida-Sanchez v. United
    Search
  44. Page 466 U. S. 236 Relying upon United States v. Martinez-Fuerte
    Search
  45. U.S. Supreme Court INS v. Delgado
    Search
  46. Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Delgado
    Search
  47. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, AFL-CIO v. Sureck
    Search
  48. United States v. Anderson
    Search
  49. Babula v. INS
    Search
  50. Dunaway v. New
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial