Citation network
United States Vs. Cronic
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 14, 1984
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 648 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. CronicSearch
-
U.S. 648 (1984) United States v. CronicSearch
-
F.2d 1126, 1129 (CA10 1982) (quoting United States v. GolubSearch
-
In Cuyler v. SullivanSearch
-
Id. at 446 U. S. 344 . And in Engle v. IsaacSearch
-
Herrin v. NewSearch
-
Williams v. TwomeySearch
-
F.2d 634, 640 (CA7), cert. denied sub nom. Sielaff v. WilliamsSearch
-
on the reliability of the trial process, the Sixth Amendment guarantee is generally not implicated. See United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSearch
-
because we presume that the lawyer is competent to provide the guiding hand that the defendant needs, see Michel v. LouisianaSearch
-
makes the adversary process itself presumptively unreliable. No specific showing of prejudice was required in Davis v. AlaskaSearch
-
Id. at 415 U. S. 318 (citing Smith v. IllinoisSearch
-
U. S. 129 , 390 U. S. 131 (1968), and Brookhart v. JanisSearch
-
so small that a presumption of prejudice is appropriate without inquiry into the actual conduct of the trial. Powell v. AlabamaSearch
-
But every refusal to postpone a criminal trial will not give rise to such a presumption. In Avery v. AlabamaSearch
-
Similarly, in Chambers v. MaroneySearch
-
See Williams v. UnitedSearch
-
Time has not eroded the force of Justice Sutherland's opinion for the Court in Powell v. AlabamaSearch
-
See United States v. AshSearch
-
United States v. DecosterSearch
-
Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
Parker v. NorthSearch
-
Polk County v. DodsonSearch
-
Jones v. BarnesSearch
-
See Engle v. IsaacSearch
-
Brady v. UnitedSearch
-
counsel cannot create one, and may disserve the interests of his client by attempting a useless charade. See Nickols v. GagnonSearch
-
to plead guilty if that advice falls within the range of reasonable competence under the circumstances. See Tollett v. HendersonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. CronicSearch
-
United States v. GolubSearch
-
Williams v. TwomeySearch
-
Sielaff v. WilliamsSearch
-
See United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial