Citation network
Welsh Vs. Wisconsin
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 15, 1984
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 740 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court Welsh v. WisconsinSearch
-
U.S. 740 (1984) Welsh v. WisconsinSearch
-
J., joined, post, p. 466 U. S. 756 . JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court. Payton v. NewSearch
-
U. S. 744 to submit to the appropriate testing or risk a revocation of operating privileges. Cf. South Dakota v. NevilleSearch
-
consistently provided that a valid arrest is a necessary prerequisite to the imposition of a breath test. See Scales v. StateSearch
-
a) (Supp.1983-1984). See State v. AlbrightSearch
-
license for 60 days. On appeal, the suspension order was vacated by the Wisconsin Court of Appeals. See State v. WelshSearch
-
United States v. UnitedSearch
-
Fourth Amendment on agents of the government who seek to enter the home for purposes of search or arrest. See Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Payton v. NewSearch
-
York, 445 U.S. at 445 U. S. 586 . See Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
Michigan v. CliffordSearch
-
Steagald v. UnitedSearch
-
McDonald v. UnitedSearch
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
Boyd v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 630 (1886). Consistently with these long-recognized principles, the Court decided in Payton v. NewSearch
-
searches or arrests. Indeed, the Court has recognized only a few such emergency conditions, see, e.g., United States v. SantanaSearch
-
that overcome the presumption of unreasonableness that attaches to all warrantless home entries. See Payton v. NewSearch
-
probable cause by a neutral and detached magistrate. This is not a novel idea. Writing in concurrence in McDonald v. UnitedSearch
-
that the gravity of the underlying offense was a principal factor Page 466 U. S. 752 to be weighed. Dorman v. UnitedSearch
-
exigencies, independent of the gravity of the offense, existed at the time of the arrest. Compare United States v. CampbellSearch
-
CA2 1978) (allowing warrantless home arrest for armed robbery when exigent circumstances existed), with Commonwealth v. WilliamsSearch
-
addressing the issue, most have refused to permit warrantless home arrests for nonfelonious crimes. See, e.g., State v. GertinSearch
-
People v. StrelowSearch
-
Mich.App. 182, 190-193, 292 N.W.2d 517, 521-522 (1980). See also People v. SandersSearch
-
State v. BennettSearch
-
N.W.2d 5 (S.D.1980) (distribution of controlled substances not a grave offense for these purposes). But cf. State v. PenasSearch
-
State v. NiedermeyerSearch
-
exigent circumstances, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals remanded for full consideration of the consent issue. See State v. WelshSearch
-
for a nonjailable traffic offense that constituted only a civil violation under the applicable state law. See Beck v. OhioSearch
-
or semi-incapacitated because of alcohol or drug ingestion. I have spoken in these Reports to this point before. Perez v. CampbellSearch
-
U. S. 395 , 401 U. S. 401 (1971) (concurring opinion). See also South Dakota v. NevilleSearch
-
occurred in the officer's presence to justify a warrantless arrest is not grounded in the Fourth Amendment, see Street v. SurdykaSearch
-
the officers who arrested him had violated the Federal Constitution. 108 Wis.2d 319, 321 N.W.2d 245 (1982). See Scales v. StateSearch
-
Black v. CutterSearch
-
over cases in which the States have provided remedies for violations of federally defined obligations. E.g., Moore v. ChesapeakeSearch
-
In any event, I believe that the state court properly construed the Fourth Amendment. It follows from Payton v. NewSearch
-
offense are always impermissible. If anything, the Court's prior decisions support the opposite conclusion. See Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
States, 335 U. S. 451 , 335 U. S. 454 -455 (1948). See also State v. PenaSearch
-
crimes. The Court relies heavily on Justice Jackson's Page 466 U. S. 761 concurring opinion in McDonald v. UnitedSearch
-
Nevertheless, this Court has long recognized the compelling state interest in highway safety, South Dakota v. NevilleSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Welsh v. WisconsinSearch
-
of the Court. Payton v. NewSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial