Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Tate Vs. Rose

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 19, 1984

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

27 entries 1 linked 26 unlinked
Show
  1. Solem Vs. Stumes US Supreme Court · Feb 29, 1984
    Relied / Followed
  2. U.S. 1301 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court Tate v. Rose
    Search
  3. U.S. 1301 (1984) Tate v. Rose
    Search
  4. made by respondent to a police officer and introduced at respondent's trial were elicited in violation of Edwards v. Arizona
    Search
  5. s case. Because petitioner's petition presents an open question, and because this Court's subsequent decision in Solem v. Stumes
    Search
  6. The District Court granted the writ, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed. Rose v. Engle
    Search
  7. outcome of this Court's consideration of the case on the merits. See Gregory-Portland Independent School District v. United
    Search
  8. police officer's renewed questioning. Petitioner concedes that these statements were elicited in violation of Edwards v. Arizona
    Search
  9. affirmed the District Court's grant of habeas relief because it concluded, following the analysis of United States v. Johnson
    Search
  10. in the petition is whether the Edwards decision should have been applied to respondent's case. In Solem v. Stumes
    Search
  11. U. S. 638 (1984), this Court recently decided that Edwards v. Arizona
    Search
  12. final when Edwards was decided. The petition in No. 83-1747 accordingly presents a question left open in Solem v. Stumes
    Search
  13. s case. First, the Court concluded, contrary to the Sixth Circuit's view, that the analysis adopted in United States v. Johnson
    Search
  14. an erroneous approach in considering the retroactivity of Edwards. Second, the rationale of the Court in Solem v. Stumes
    Search
  15. before Edwards was decided. Because the petition in No. 83-1747 presents an open question, and because Solem v. Stumes
    Search
  16. merits, I think it likely that the Court will either (1) give plenary consideration to the question left open in Solem v. Stumes
    Search
  17. of Appeals or (2) vacate the Court of Appeals' judgment and remand the case for reconsideration in light of Solem v. Stumes
    Search
  18. grant the application for a stay of the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Rose v. Engle
    Search
  19. U.S. Supreme Court Tate v. Rose
    Search
  20. of Edwards v. Arizona
    Search
  21. Rose v. Engle
    Search
  22. See Gregory-Portland Independent School District v. United
    Search
  23. of United States v. Johnson
    Search
  24. In Solem v. Stumes
    Search
  25. Edwards v. Arizona
    Search
  26. United States v. Johnson
    Search
  27. of Solem v. Stumes
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial