Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Waller Vs. Georgia

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 21, 1984

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

37 entries 3 linked 34 unlinked
Show
  1. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. Vs. Virginia US Supreme Court · Jul 02, 1980
  2. Douglas Vs. Wainwright US Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1963
  3. United States Vs. Holmes US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1820
  4. U.S. 39 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court Waller v. Georgia
    Search
  5. U.S. 39 (1984) Waller v. Georgia
    Search
  6. and it must make findings adequate to support the closure. Cf. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior
    Search
  7. that the press and public have a qualified First Amendment right to attend a criminal trial. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior
    Search
  8. to the trial as such, but also to the voir dire proceeding in which the jury is selected. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior
    Search
  9. Court of California, 464 U. S. 501 (1984). Moreover, in an earlier case in this line, Gannett Co. v. DePasquale
    Search
  10. Bennett v. Rundle
    Search
  11. suppressed, a new trial presumably would be a windfall for the defendant, and not in the public interest. Cf. Goldberg v. United
    Search
  12. Jackson v. Deno
    Search
  13. Together with No. 83-322, Cole et al. v. Georgia
    Search
  14. turned the warrants into impermissible general warrants. Petitioners rely on lower court cases such as United States v. Heldt
    Search
  15. U.S.App.D.C. 206, 227, 668 F.2d 1238, 1259 (1981) (per curiam), cert. denied sub nom. Hubbard v. United
    Search
  16. States, 456 U.S. 926 (1982), and United States v. Rettig
    Search
  17. there is certainly no requirement that lawfully seized evidence be suppressed as well. See, e.g., Andresen v. Maryland
    Search
  18. United States v. Offices
    Search
  19. United States v. Tamura
    Search
  20. Accord, Estes v. Texas
    Search
  21. Douglas v. Wainwright
    Search
  22. F.2d 1532, 1542 (CA11 1983) (citing cases), cert. pending, Nos. 83-817, 83-995. See also Levine v. United
    Search
  23. difficult to prove, or a matter of chance, the Framers plainly thought them nonetheless real. See also State v. Sheppard
    Search
  24. People v. Jones
    Search
  25. U.S. Supreme Court Waller v. Georgia
    Search
  26. Cf. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior
    Search
  27. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior
    Search
  28. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior
    Search
  29. Gannett Co. v. DePasquale
    Search
  30. Bennett v. Rundle
    Search
  31. Cf. Goldberg v. United
    Search
  32. United States v. Heldt
    Search
  33. Hubbard v. United
    Search
  34. and United States v. Rettig
    Search
  35. Andresen v. Maryland
    Search
  36. Levine v. United
    Search
  37. State v. Sheppard
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial