Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Bernal Vs. Fainter

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 30, 1984

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

37 entries 3 linked 34 unlinked
Show
  1. Cabell Vs. Chavez-salido US Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1982
  2. Sugarman Vs. Dougall US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1973
  3. Foley Vs. Connelie US Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1978
  4. U.S. 216 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court Bernal v. Fainter
    Search
  5. U.S. 216 (1984) Bernal v. Fainter
    Search
  6. important elective and nonelective positions whose operations go to the heart of representative government. Sugarman v. Dougall
    Search
  7. The District Court ruled in favor of petitioner. Vargas v. Strake
    Search
  8. Vargas v. Strake
    Search
  9. we have invalidated an array of state statutes that denied aliens the right to pursue various occupations. In Sugarman v. Dougall
    Search
  10. we nullified a state law excluding aliens from eligibility for membership in the State Bar. And in Examining Board v. Flores
    Search
  11. exception are outlined by our prior decisions. In Foley v. Connelie
    Search
  12. often involving the most sensitive areas of daily life. Id. at 435 U. S. 297 . In Ambach v. Norwick
    Search
  13. students about the government and the political process. Id. at 441 U. S. 78 -79. Finally, in Cabell v. Chavez-Salido
    Search
  14. U.S. at 454 U. S. 440 (quoting Sugarman v. Dougall
    Search
  15. government. Rather, these duties are essentially clerical and ministerial. In contrast to state troopers, Foley v. Connelie
    Search
  16. youth respecting the information and values necessary for the maintenance of a democratic political system. See Ambach v. Norwick
    Search
  17. ordered. JUSTICE REHNQUIST, dissenting. I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Sugarman v. Dougall
    Search
  18. petitioner worked in a legal services program in Indiana and held a commission as a notary in that State. Vargas v. Strake
    Search
  19. a party to this suit, because, subsequent to filing her complaint, she obtained United States citizenship. Vargas v. Strake
    Search
  20. considered the constitutionality of statutes barring aliens from eligibility to become notaries public. See, e.g., Jii v. Rhodes
    Search
  21. Cheng v. Illinois
    Search
  22. Taggart v. Mandel
    Search
  23. Graham v. Ramani
    Search
  24. Graham v. Richardson
    Search
  25. minority for whom heightened judicial solicitude is appropriate. See Nyquist v. Mauclet
    Search
  26. Harbison v. McMurray
    Search
  27. That it was not even mentioned in respondents' brief is a further indication that this power is moribund. Cf. Jii v. Rhodes
    Search
  28. U.S. Supreme Court Bernal v. Fainter
    Search
  29. In Sugarman v. Dougall
    Search
  30. Examining Board v. Flores
    Search
  31. In Foley v. Connelie
    Search
  32. In Ambach v. Norwick
    Search
  33. See Ambach v. Norwick
    Search
  34. State. Vargas v. Strake
    Search
  35. Jii v. Rhodes
    Search
  36. See Nyquist v. Mauclet
    Search
  37. Cf. Jii v. Rhodes
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial