Citation network
Ncaa Vs. Board of Regents
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 02, 1984
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
NCAA v. BoardSearch
-
of Regents - 468 U.S. 85 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court NCAA v. BoardSearch
-
of Regents, 468 U.S. 85 (1984) National Collegiate Athletic Association v. BoardSearch
-
National Society of Professional Engineers v. UnitedSearch
-
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. ColumbiaSearch
-
procompetitive. See 441 U.S. at 441 U. S. 18 -23. Similarly, as we indicated in Continental T. V., Inc. v. GTESearch
-
Reiter v. SonotoneSearch
-
restraints of trade that the Sherman Page 468 U. S. 108 Act was intended to prohibit. See Standard Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Page 468 U. S. 112 analysis is firmly supported by our decision in International Boxing Club of New York, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
viewers. Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Arizona v. MaricopaSearch
-
borne out by the District Court's finding that the NCAA's television plan reduces the volume of television rights sold. v. ThroughoutSearch
-
respondents had suffered no injury of the type the antitrust laws were designed to prevent, relying on Brunswick Corp. v. PuebloSearch
-
to a finding of fact which has been made by a district court and approved by a court of appeals. See, e.g., Rogers v. LodgeSearch
-
Arizona v. MaricopaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Chicago Board of Trade v. UnitedSearch
-
See Arizona v. MaricopaSearch
-
United States v. TopcoSearch
-
Associates, Inc., 405 U. S. 596 , 405 U. S. 608 -611 (1972). See also United States v. SealySearch
-
United States v. TopcoSearch
-
United States v. SealySearch
-
United States v. AmericanSearch
-
American Column & Lumber Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Catalano, Inc. v. TargetSearch
-
Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. JosephSearch
-
United States v. Socony-VacuumSearch
-
United States v. TrentonSearch
-
White Motor Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
of the per se rule without inquiry into the special characteristics of a particular industry. See Arizona v. MaricopaSearch
-
applies to nonprofit entities, Goldfarb v. VirginiaSearch
-
on nonprofit entities which have engaged in anticompetitive conduct, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Inc. v. HydrolevelSearch
-
nevertheless well settled that good motives will not validate an otherwise anticompetitive practice. See United States v. GriffithSearch
-
Associated Press v. UnitedSearch
-
Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. Trans-MissouriSearch
-
See Justice v. NCAASearch
-
Jones v. NCAASearch
-
College Athletic Placement Service, Inc. v. NCAASearch
-
Trade Cases 1160, 117 (NJ), aff'd mem., 506 F.2d 1050 (CA3 1974). See also Brenner v. WorldSearch
-
Neeld v. NationalSearch
-
Smith v. ProSearch
-
Hatley v. AmericanSearch
-
Mackey v. NationalSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court NCAA v. BoardSearch
-
National Collegiate Athletic Association v. BoardSearch
-
Continental T. V., Inc. v. GTESearch
-
See Standard Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
International Boxing Club of New York, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Brunswick Corp. v. PuebloSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial