Citation network
Franchise Tax Board Vs. Usps
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 11, 1984
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 512 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court Franchise Tax Board v. USPSSearch
-
U.S. 512 (1984) Franchise Tax Board of California v. UnitedSearch
-
but it also must presume that appellee's liability is the same as that of any other business. FHA v. BurrSearch
-
excused the Service from complying with the orders. Employment Development Department v. UnitedSearch
-
a debt through a judicial order requiring the United States to garnishee the employee's salary. See Buchanan v. AlexanderSearch
-
in FHA v. BurrSearch
-
the scope of such a waiver can only be ascertained by reference to underlying congressional policy. Keifer & Keifer v. ReconstructionSearch
-
Bull v. UnitedSearch
-
be inconsistent with federal law, and hence invalid under the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. See California v. GraceSearch
-
United States v. ClarkSearch
-
See City of Detroit v. MurraySearch
-
U. S. 495 , 309 U. S. 501 (1940). See also Petty v. Tennessee-MissouriSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Brady v. RooseveltSearch
-
S.S. Co., 317 U. S. 575 , 317 U. S. 580 (1943). See generally National City Bank of New York v. RepublicSearch
-
Keifer & Keifer v. ReconstructionSearch
-
been that the Postal Reorganization Act constitutes a waiver of sovereign immunity. See Insurance Co. of North America v. UnitedSearch
-
Portmann v. UnitedSearch
-
Associates Financial Services of America, Inc. v. RobinsonSearch
-
Beneficial Finance Co. of New York, Inc. v. DallasSearch
-
General Electric Credit Corp. v. SmithSearch
-
Goodman's Furniture Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
May Department Stores Co. v. WilliamsonSearch
-
Standard Oil Division v. StarksSearch
-
Kennedy Electric Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Butz Engineering Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
Milner v. BolgerSearch
-
Lutz v. UnitedSearch
-
Lincoln National Bank & Trust Co. v. MarottaSearch
-
Bank of Virginia v. TompkinsSearch
-
National v. EavesSearch
-
Iowa-Des Moines National Bank v. UnitedSearch
-
Colonial Bank v. BroussardSearch
-
F.Supp. 686 (ED La.1975). But see Nolan v. WoodruffSearch
-
Drs. Macht, Podore & Associates, Inc. v. GirtonSearch
-
Lawhorn v. LawhornSearch
-
Insurance Fund v. GriffinSearch
-
H.R.Rep. No. 91-1104, pp. 16-17 (1970). See also National Assn. of Greeting Card Publishers v. UnitedSearch
-
G. Menihan Corp., 312 U.S. at 312 U. S. 84 . See also Federal Land Bank v. PriddySearch
-
U.S. at 306 U. S. 388 -389 (citations omitted) (quoting Luxton v. NorthSearch
-
of the notice and opportunity for hearing that the four Postal Service employees received. See generally Commissioner v. ShapiroSearch
-
Kanarek v. DavidsonSearch
-
the assessment of a tax until after the taxpayer has exhausted his administrative refund remedy. See Aronoff v. FranchiseSearch
-
California v. GraceSearch
-
See G. M. Leasing Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
Hager v. ReclamationSearch
-
District No. 108, 111 U. S. 701 , 111 U. S. 710 (1884). See also Randall v. FranchiseSearch
-
Greene v. FranchiseSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial