Citation network
Mabry Vs. Johnson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 11, 1984
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 504 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court Mabry v. JohnsonSearch
-
U.S. 504 (1984) Mabry v. JohnsonSearch
-
prosecutor was negligent or otherwise culpable in first making and then withdrawing his offer relevant. Cf. Santobello v. NewSearch
-
burglary, assault, and murder. The murder conviction was set aside by the Arkansas Supreme Court, Johnson v. StateSearch
-
consensual character of the plea is called into question that the validity of a guilty plea may be impaired. In Brady v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 397 U. S. 755 (quoting Shelton v. UnitedSearch
-
was not fairly apprised of its consequences can his plea be challenged under the Due Process Clause. Santobello v. NewSearch
-
Compare Virgin Islands v. ScotlandSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
F.2d 360 (CA3 1980), and United States v. GreenmanSearch
-
F.2d 1377 (CA11), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 992 (1983), with Cooper v. UnitedSearch
-
of the State, see Jones v. CunninghamSearch
-
Justices of Boston Municipal Court v. LydonSearch
-
Hensle v. MunicipalSearch
-
E.g., Townsend v. SainSearch
-
court impose a recommended sentence, since a negotiated sentence recommendation does not bind the court, see Varnedare v. StateSearch
-
Marshall v. StateSearch
-
entitlement and a mere hope or expectation that the trial court will follow the prosecutor's recommendation, see Olim v. WakinekonaSearch
-
Jago v. VanSearch
-
Connecticut Board of Pardons v. DumschatSearch
-
See Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
Kercheval v. UnitedSearch
-
See Tollett v. HendersonSearch
-
Parker v. NorthSearch
-
Brady v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 397 U. S. 742 , 397 U. S. 747 -748 (1970). See also Henderson v. MorganSearch
-
Menna v. NewSearch
-
See Corbitt v. NewSearch
-
Santobello v. NewSearch
-
York, 404 U. S. 257 , 404 U. S. 260 -261 (1971). For example, in Brady v. UnitedSearch
-
investigation for reasons entirely unrelated to what defense counsel has done or is likely to do. See United States v. GoodwinSearch
-
that is all the Constitution requires. See United States v. CronicSearch
-
Id. at 404 U. S. 262 . Cf. United states v. AgursSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Mabry v. JohnsonSearch
-
Cf. Santobello v. NewSearch
-
the Arkansas Supreme Court, Johnson v. StateSearch
-
In Brady v. UnitedSearch
-
Shelton v. UnitedSearch
-
the Due Process Clause. Santobello v. NewSearch
-
and United States v. GreenmanSearch
-
Cooper v. UnitedSearch
-
Jones v. CunninghamSearch
-
Justices of Boston Municipal Court v. LydonSearch
-
Varnedare v. StateSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial