Citation network
California Vs. Trombetta
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 11, 1984
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 479 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court California v. TrombettaSearch
-
U.S. 479 (1984) California v. TrombettaSearch
-
did not destroy the breath samples in a calculated effort to circumvent the due process requirement of Brady v. MarylandSearch
-
to disclose to criminal defendants favorable evidence that is material either to guilt or to punishment. United States v. AgursSearch
-
Brady v. PageSearch
-
Cal.App.3d at 141-142, 190 Cal.Rptr. at 320-321. Relying heavily on the California Supreme Court's decision in People v. HitchSearch
-
obligation to report to the defendant and to the trial court whenever government witnesses lie under oath. Napue v. IllinoisSearch
-
Mooney v. HolohanSearch
-
evidence that is either material to the guilt of the defendant or relevant to the punishment to be imposed. Brady v. MarylandSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
duty to turn over exculpatory evidence that would raise a reasonable doubt about the defendant's guilt. United States v. AgursSearch
-
The prosecution must also reveal the contents of plea agreements with key government witnesses, see Giglio v. UnitedSearch
-
be required to disclose the identity of undercover informants who possess evidence critical to the defense, Roviaro v. UnitedSearch
-
its sovereign powers so as to hamper a criminal defendant's preparation for trial. For instance, in United States v. MarionSearch
-
U. S. 307 , 404 U. S. 324 (1971), and in United States v. LovascoSearch
-
for so long that the defendant's ability to mount an effective defense was impaired. Similarly, in United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSearch
-
task of divining the import of materials whose contents are unknown and, very often, disputed. Cf. United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSearch
-
discussed due process constraints on the Government's failure to preserve potentially exculpatory evidence is Killian v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 242. In many respects, the instant case is reminiscent of Killian v. UnitedSearch
-
respondents' breath samples in a calculated effort to circumvent the disclosure requirements established by Brady v. MarylandSearch
-
Killian v. UnitedSearch
-
Page 467 U. S. 489 To meet this standard of constitutional materiality, see United States v. AgursSearch
-
Michigan v. CliffordSearch
-
People v. HitchSearch
-
though the ampoule might have been saved for retesting by the defendant. Relying on this Court's decisions in Brady v. MarylandSearch
-
U. S. 83 (1963), and Giglio v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. BryantSearch
-
was uncertainty whether the California courts would extend the Hitch decision to the Intoxilyzer. In People v. MillerSearch
-
witnesses on their own behalf and to cross-examine witnesses who have testified on the government's behalf. See Davis v. AlaskaSearch
-
Washington v. TexasSearch
-
In our prosecutorial disclosure cases, we have imposed a similar requirement of materiality, United States v. AgursSearch
-
Moore v. IllinoisSearch
-
then Intoxilyzer results, without more, might be insufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. VirginiaSearch
-
the admissibility of scientific evidence than those imposed by the Federal Constitution. See, e.g., Lauderdale v. StateSearch
-
City of Lodi v. HineSearch
-
concerning preservation of evidence are generally matters of state, not federal constitutional, law. See United States v. AugenblickSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court California v. TrombettaSearch
-
of Brady v. MarylandSearch
-
Napue v. IllinoisSearch
-
Brady v. MarylandSearch
-
Giglio v. UnitedSearch
-
Roviaro v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSearch
-
of Killian v. UnitedSearch
-
Michigan v. CliffordSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial