Citation network
Nix Vs. Williams
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 11, 1984
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 431 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court Nix v. WilliamsSearch
-
U.S. 431 (1984) Nix v. WilliamsSearch
-
s incriminating statements through interrogation in violation of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Brewer v. WilliamsSearch
-
the judgment of conviction was affirmed by the Iowa Supreme Court. State v. WilliamsSearch
-
of Iowa. That court concluded that the evidence in question had been wrongly admitted at Williams' trial, Williams v. BrewerSearch
-
statements from Williams by what was viewed as interrogation in violation of his right to counsel. Brewer v. WilliamsSearch
-
of unlawful governmental conduct had its genesis in Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Ibid. (emphasis added). Wong Sun v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
violation. The Court has applied the doctrine where the violations were of the Sixth Amendment, see United States v. WadeSearch
-
See Murphy v. WaterfrontSearch
-
Kastigar v. UnitedSearch
-
if ever, be in a position to calculate whether the evidence sought would inevitably be discovered. Cf. United States v. CeccoliniSearch
-
lessen the likelihood that the ultimate or inevitable discovery exception will promote police misconduct. See Bivens v. SixSearch
-
adversary process in which the reliability of proffered evidence may be tested in cross-examination. See United States v. AshSearch
-
People v. DeforeSearch
-
of the means by which it was found. Id. at 23-24, 150 N.E. at 588. Cardozo's prophecy was fulfilled in Killough v. UnitedSearch
-
directed some 200 volunteers who were searching for the child's body. Tr. of Hearings on Motion to Suppress in State v. WilliamsSearch
-
review of factual as well as legal determinations in cases raising constitutional challenges. See, e.g., Amelto v. BaughmanSearch
-
State v. EgeSearch
-
the Eighth Circuit in a case decided after the instant case, has endorsed the inevitable discovery doctrine. See Wayne v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. BienvenueSearch
-
Government of Virgin Islands v. GereauSearch
-
United States v. SeohnleinSearch
-
United States v. BrookinsSearch
-
Papp v. JagoSearch
-
Owens v. TwomeySearch
-
United States v. ApkerSearch
-
United States v. SchmidtSearch
-
United States v. RomeroSearch
-
United States v. RoperSearch
-
In Murphy v. WaterfrontSearch
-
concurring). Application of the independent source doctrine in the Fifth Amendment context was reaffirmed in Kastigar v. UnitedSearch
-
discovery exception to the exclusionary rule is closely related in purpose to the harmless error rule of Chapman v. CaliforniaSearch
-
As to the quantum of proof, we have already established some relevant guidelines. In United States v. MatlockSearch
-
In Lego v. TwomeySearch
-
argues that the preponderance of the evidence standard used by the Iowa courts is inconsistent with United States v. WadeSearch
-
under the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule, we find it unnecessary to decide whether Stone v. PowellSearch
-
only to point out that many of Justice Stevens' remarks are beside the point when it is recalled that Brewer v. WilliamsSearch
-
To anyone not lost in the intricacies of the prophylactic Page 467 U. S. 451 rules of Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
adversarial process protected by the Sixth Amendment may not be undermined by the strategems of the police. Spano v. NewSearch
-
Douglas, J., concurring, joined by Black and BRENNAN, JJ.). This view ripened into a holding in Massiah v. UnitedSearch
-
ante at 467 U. S. 447 (quoting People v. DeforeSearch
-
result of his conduct, this defendant received the type of trial that the Sixth Amendment envisions. See United States v. MorrisonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial