Citation network
Pbgc Vs. R. A. Gray and Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 18, 1984
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U. S. 732 -733. Page 467 U. S. 719 (d) Unlike the statute invalidated in Railroad Retirement Board v. AltonSearch
-
benefits by the termination of pension plans before sufficient funds have been accumulated in the plans. Nachman Corp. v. PensionSearch
-
Guaranty Corp., 446 U. S. 359 , 446 U. S. 361 -362, 446 U. S. 374 -375 (1980). See Alessi v. Raybestos-ManhattanSearch
-
on employers by applying a four-part test established by the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Nachman Corp. v. PensionSearch
-
to use when analyzing the constitutionality of retroactive legislation enacted by Congress. Shelter Framing Corp. v. PensionSearch
-
and now reverse. II The starting point for analysis is our decision in Usery v. TurnerSearch
-
process violation to establish that the legislature has acted in an arbitrary and irrational way. See, e.g., Ferguson v. SkrupaSearch
-
Williamson v. LeeSearch
-
readjusting rights and burdens is not unlawful solely because it upsets otherwise settled expectations. See Fleming v. RhodesSearch
-
Carpenter v. WabashSearch
-
Norman v. BaltimoreSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Home Bldg. & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSearch
-
Louisville Page 467 U. S. 730 & Nashville R. Co. v. MottleySearch
-
is true even though the effect of the legislation is to impose a new duty or liability based on past acts. See Lichter v. UnitedSearch
-
Funkhouser v. PrestonSearch
-
purposes. As we recently noted when upholding the retroactive application of an income tax statute in United States v. DarusmontSearch
-
Group, Inc. v. KansasSearch
-
with prohibitions existing against state impairments of preexisting contracts. See, e.g., Philadelphia, B. & W. R. Co. v. SchubertSearch
-
the less searching standards imposed on economic legislation by the Due Process Clauses. See United States Trust Co. v. NewSearch
-
ibid. (quoting Welch v. HenrySearch
-
Turner Elkhorn. Finally, Gray urges that we resuscitate the Court's 1935 decision in Railroad Retirement Board v. AltonSearch
-
n 4, supra. These issues were not reached by the Court of Appeals, Shelter Framing Corp. v. PensionSearch
-
Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause primarily by relying upon this Court's decisions in Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSearch
-
U. S. 234 (1978), and Railroad Retirement Board v. AltonSearch
-
might in some circumstances be relevant in determining whether retroactive legislation is rational. Cf. Nachman Corp. v. PensionSearch
-
MPPAA's withdrawal liability provisions satisfies constitutional standards. See, e.g., Textile Workers Pension Fund v. StandardSearch
-
Peick v. PensionSearch
-
Republic Industries, Inc. v. TeamstersSearch
-
constitutional challenges raised in those cases, however, have upheld the statute. See, e.g., The Washington Star Co. v. InternationalSearch
-
Textile Workers Pension Fund v. StandardSearch
-
Railroad Retirement Board v. AltonSearch
-
Nachman Corp. v. PensionSearch
-
See Alessi v. Raybestos-ManhattanSearch
-
Congress. Shelter Framing Corp. v. PensionSearch
-
Usery v. TurnerSearch
-
See Fleming v. RhodesSearch
-
& Nashville R. Co. v. MottleySearch
-
See Lichter v. UnitedSearch
-
Philadelphia, B. & W. R. Co. v. SchubertSearch
-
the Due Process Clauses. See United States Trust Co. v. NewSearch
-
the Court of Appeals, Shelter Framing Corp. v. PensionSearch
-
and Railroad Retirement Board v. AltonSearch
-
Cf. Nachman Corp. v. PensionSearch
-
Textile Workers Pension Fund v. StandardSearch
-
The Washington Star Co. v. InternationalSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial