Citation network
Tower Vs. Glover
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 25, 1984
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 914 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court Tower v. GloverSearch
-
U.S. 914 (1984) Tower v. GloverSearch
-
state law in the normal course of conducting the defense, Polk County v. DodsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
state law when engaged in a conspiracy with state officials to deprive another of federal rights, Dennis v. SparksSearch
-
rights. I Glover was arrested on February 1, 1976, in Del Norte County, Cal. Pet. for Cert. in Glover v. DolanSearch
-
from that conviction. The conviction was summarily affirmed by the Oregon Court of Appeals on January 18, 1978. Oregon v. GloverSearch
-
five days later, he was sentenced to 10 years in prison. This conviction was affirmed on April 17, 1978. Oregon v. GloverSearch
-
District Court dismissed the habeas petition on the ground that Glover had failed to exhaust state remedies. Glover v. DolanSearch
-
cause on July 12, 1978, agreeing with the District Court that Glover had failed to exhaust state remedies. Glover v. DolanSearch
-
liability, Miller v. BarillaSearch
-
reversed the Federal District Court's decision and remanded for trial in light of this Court's decisions in Ferri v. AckermanSearch
-
U. S. 193 (1979), and Polk County v. DodsonSearch
-
see 700 F.2d at 558, n. 1. Page 467 U. S. 920 In Polk County v. DodsonSearch
-
state law in the normal course of conducting the defense. See also Ferri v. AckermanSearch
-
supra. In Dennis v. SparksSearch
-
litigation. See Imbler v. PachtmanSearch
-
immunity for legislators acting within their legislative roles, Tenney v. BrandhoveSearch
-
U. S. 367 (1951), for judges acting within their judicial roles, Pierson v. RaySearch
-
U. S. 547 , 386 U. S. 554 -555 (1967), for prosecutors, Imbler v. PachtmanSearch
-
supra, and for witnesses, Briscoe v. LaHueSearch
-
and has recognized qualified immunity for state executive officers and school officials, see Scheuer v. RhodesSearch
-
actions. See Imbler v. PachtmanSearch
-
contractual relationship with their clients, and they are incapable of suing their clients for a fee. See Rondel v. WorsleySearch
-
enjoyed in the 19th century, as they still do today, a broad immunity from liability for negligent misconduct. Rondel v. WorsleySearch
-
not suggest that such a lawyer would have enjoyed immunity from tort liability for intentional misconduct. Cf. Baker v. HumphreySearch
-
Von Wallhoffen v. NewcombeSearch
-
Hoopes Page 467 U. S. 922 v. BurnettSearch
-
would have benefited from immunity for defamatory statements made in the course of judicial proceedings, see Imbler v. PachtmanSearch
-
Cf. Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
Patsy v. FloridaSearch
-
complaint never occurred. Allen v. McCurrySearch
-
Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed in connection with Pet. for Cert. in Glover v. DolanSearch
-
Glover v. DolanSearch
-
Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation, Dec. 6, 1977), reprinted in App. to Response to Pet. for Cert. in Glover v. DolanSearch
-
Pet. for Cert. in Glover v. DolanSearch
-
Windsor v. GibsonSearch
-
Donigan v. FinnSearch
-
Reese v. DanforthSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial