Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Sure-tan, Inc. Vs. Nlrb

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 25, 1984

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

62 entries 4 linked 58 unlinked
Show
  1. De Canas Vs. Bica US Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1976
  2. Phelps Dodge Corp. Vs. Nlrb US Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1941
  3. Ford Motor Co. Vs. Nlrb US Supreme Court · May 14, 1979
  4. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. Vs. NLRB US Supreme Court · May 31, 1983
  5. U.S. 883 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court Sure-Tan, Inc. v. NLRB
    Search
  6. U.S. 883 (1984) Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National
    Search
  7. and therefore could not be burdened under the guise of enforcing the NLRA. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. NLRB
    Search
  8. NLRB v. Hearst
    Search
  9. considerable deference, and we will uphold any interpretation that is reasonably defensible. See, e.g., Ford Motor Co. v. NLRB
    Search
  10. NLRB v. Iron
    Search
  11. NLRB v. Erie
    Search
  12. coworkers, thereby eroding the unity of all the employees and impeding effective collective bargaining. See NLRB v. Jones
    Search
  13. Ibid. See De Canas v. Bica
    Search
  14. NLRB v. Haberman
    Search
  15. Cartwright Hardware Co. v. NLRB
    Search
  16. J. P. Stevens & Co. v. NLRB
    Search
  17. NLRB v. Holly
    Search
  18. INA and the NLRA. Finally, petitioners claim that this Court's recent decision in Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. NLRB
    Search
  19. process in order to seek the redress of any wrongs committed against them. Cf. California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking
    Search
  20. have no judicially cognizable interest in procuring enforcement of the immigration laws by the INS. Cf. Linda R. S. v. Richard
    Search
  21. U.S. at 461 U. S. 741 (quoting San Diego Page 467 U. S. 898 Building Trades Council v. Garmon
    Search
  22. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  23. Phelps Dodge Corp., supra, at 313 U. S. 194 . See also NLRB v. Seven-Up
    Search
  24. Page 467 U. S. 900 Not only did the court overstep the limits of its own reviewing authority, see NLRB v. Seven-Up
    Search
  25. NLRB v. MacKay
    Search
  26. to the employee's responsibility to mitigate damages in fashioning an equitable backpay award. See, e.g., NLRB v. Seven-Up
    Search
  27. Nathanson v. NLRB
    Search
  28. Trico Products Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  29. F.2d 347, 353-354 (CA2 1973). Cf. Teamsters v. United
    Search
  30. evidence as to the amounts of backpay, if any, to which the discharged employees are individually entitled. See NLRB v. Mastro
    Search
  31. Southern S.S. Co. v. NLRB
    Search
  32. failing to impose such requirements, the appropriate course was to remand back to the Board for reconsideration. NLRB v. Food
    Search
  33. the court believed the offers to have been deficient, and to decide upon new forms for the reinstatement offers. NLRB v. Food
    Search
  34. Store Employees, supra. v. For
    Search
  35. is pretextual, the fact that the action taken is otherwise legal or even praiseworthy is not controlling. See NLRB v. Transportation
    Search
  36. Inc., 205 N.L.R.B. 418, 420 (1973) (discriminatory discharge of underage employee). Indeed, as we noted in NLRB v. Erie
    Search
  37. NLRB v. Lundy
    Search
  38. of their First Amendment challenge for the first time before this Court. See, e.g., Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University
    Search
  39. NLRB v. Food
    Search
  40. reconstructing what would have happened to certain employees but for their discriminatory discharge. See, e.g., NLRB v. Superior
    Search
  41. Buncher v. NLRB
    Search
  42. compensation due and had permitted the employer to come forward with evidence mitigating liability. See, e.g., NLRB v. Superior
    Search
  43. and hence beyond the authority of the Board under Republic Steel Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  44. NLRB v. Seven-Up
    Search
  45. from usurpation by the courts. NLRB v. Food
    Search
  46. U. S. 346 -347 (1953) (emphasis added) (quoting Page 467 U. S. 908 Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. NLRB
    Search
  47. U.S. Supreme Court Sure-Tan, Inc. v. NLRB
    Search
  48. Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National
    Search
  49. the NLRA. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. NLRB
    Search
  50. See NLRB v. Jones
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial