Citation network
Cooper Vs. Frb of Richmond
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 25, 1984
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Cooper v. FRBSearch
-
of Richmond - 467 U.S. 867 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court Cooper v. FRBSearch
-
of Richmond, 467 U.S. 867 (1984) Cooper v. FederalSearch
-
grades 4 and 5, and (2) two of the intervening plaintiffs had not been discriminated against on account of race. EEOC v. FederalSearch
-
entertained class action is binding on class members in any subsequent litigation. See, e.g., Supreme Tribe of Ben-Hur v. CaubleSearch
-
remained open and the employer continued to seek applicants of the plaintiff's qualifications. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSearch
-
Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. BurdineSearch
-
particular employment decision at issue was made on the basis of race. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSearch
-
United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSearch
-
U.S. at 460 U. S. 716 . In Franks v. BowmanSearch
-
Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 431 U. S. 360 , n. 46. See generally Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSearch
-
U. S. 575 , n. 7 (1978). This distinction was critical to our holding in General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSearch
-
NAACP v. ClaiborneSearch
-
the elements of a prima facie pattern-or-practice case are the same in a private class action. See Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
EEOC v. FederalSearch
-
discrimination in support of the statistical evidence offered by plaintiffs, or with that in our own case of Chisholm v. UnitedSearch
-
of a presentation of oral testimony in support of a pattern of discrimination than that found wanting in Ste. Marie v. EasternSearch
-
would be insufficient to support the inference of a routine or regular practice of discrimination . . . ,' or, in Goff v. ContinentalSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Cooper v. FRBSearch
-
Cooper v. FederalSearch
-
In Franks v. BowmanSearch
-
General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSearch
-
See Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
of Chisholm v. UnitedSearch
-
Ste. Marie v. EasternSearch
-
Goff v. ContinentalSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial