Citation network
Patton Vs. Yount
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 26, 1984
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 1025 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court Patton v. YountSearch
-
U.S. 1025 (1984) Patton v. YountSearch
-
jury was impartial, the District Court denied relief, but the Court of Appeals reversed. Relying primarily on Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
that would have made a fair trial unlikely by the empaneled jury as a whole. Although Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
he was sentenced to life imprisonment. On direct appeal, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court determined that, under Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
notice of his right to an attorney prior to his confession. The court remanded for a new trial. Commonwealth v. YountSearch
-
was without bias. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court affirmed the conviction and the trial court's findings. Commonwealth v. YountSearch
-
for the Third Circuit reversed. 710 F.2d 956 (1983). The court relied primarily on the analysis set out in Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
As noted, the Court of Appeals rested its decision that the jury was not impartial on this Court's decision in Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
Tr. 771, 959, 1027. That time soothes and erases is a perfectly natural phenomenon, familiar to all. See Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
d) does not apply. The opinions below relied for this proposition on Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
decide the case on the evidence, and should the juror's protestation of impartiality have been believed. Cf. Rushen v. SpainSearch
-
biased veniremen. It is fair to assume that the method we have relied on since the beginning, e.g., United States v. BurrSearch
-
U. S. 500 (1984). The respect paid such findings in a habeas proceeding certainly should be no less. See Marshall v. LonbergerSearch
-
cause only three of the actual jurors. In Irvin, the defendant challenged each of his 12 jurors for cause. Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
factual findings, see Pub.L. 89-711, 80 Stat. 1105-1106, and two years before this Court's opinion in Townsend v. SainSearch
-
in Irvin do not appear to be significantly less probing than those here. See Brief for Petitioner in Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
In Murphy v. FloridaSearch
-
to which habeas courts owe special deference, see Rushen, 464 U.S. at 464 U. S. 120 . Cf. Marshall v. LonbergerSearch
-
U. S. 431 -432 (1983) (similar analysis as to whether a guilty plea was voluntary). See also Reynolds v. UnitedSearch
-
the latter may be set aside only for manifest error). The dissent misreads the Court's opinion in Reynolds v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. DuncanSearch
-
Calley v. CallawaySearch
-
F.2d 184, 209, n. 45 (CA5 1975) (en banc) (citing cases), cert. denied sub nom Calley v. HoffmanSearch
-
U.S. 911 (1976). But cf. Smith v. PhillipsSearch
-
In 1969, a divided Supreme Court of Pennsylvania reversed Yount's conviction and ordered a new trial. Commonwealth v. YountSearch
-
I do not believe that the jury was capable of deciding the case solely on the evidence before it. Smith v. PhillipsSearch
-
ante at 467 U. S. 1037 , n. 12, and cites as one authority Reynolds v. UnitedSearch
-
has a disqualifying opinion is a mixed question of law and fact. The proper starting point of analysis is Reynolds v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 98 U. S. 155 -156. Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
ibid. (quoting Reynolds v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 98 U. S. 156 -157 (emphasis added). The Court also cites as authority Rushen v. SpainSearch
-
U. S. 114 (1983) (per curiam), and Marshall v. LonbergerSearch
-
the Court made sure that an apparently guilty defendant was not given too much protection by the law. See Florida v. MeyersSearch
-
and n. 3 (1984). The string of consecutive summary victories for the prosecution now stands at 20. See Massachusetts v. UptonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Patton v. YountSearch
-
Although Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
Commonwealth v. YountSearch
-
See Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
Cf. Rushen v. SpainSearch
-
See Marshall v. LonbergerSearch
-
Cf. Marshall v. LonbergerSearch
-
Reynolds v. UnitedSearch
-
Calley v. HoffmanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial