Citation network
Sec'y of State of Md. Vs. Munson Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 26, 1984
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Sec'y of State of Md. v. MunsonSearch
-
Co. - 467 U.S. 947 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court Sec'y of State of Md. v. MunsonSearch
-
Co., 467 U.S. 947 (1984) Secretary of State of Maryland v. JosephSearch
-
solicitation being an unconstitutional limitation on protected First Amendment solicitation activity. Schaumburg v. CitizensSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
post, p. 467 U. S. 975 . JUSTICE BLACKMUN delivered the opinion of the Court. In Schaumburg v. CitizensSearch
-
requirement of Art. III of the United States Constitution. Singleton v. WulffSearch
-
has Page 467 U. S. 955 suffered both threatened and actual injury as a result of the statute. See Singleton v. WulffSearch
-
Simon v. EasternSearch
-
Linda R. S. v. RichardSearch
-
U. S. 490 , 422 U. S. 499 (1975) (citing Tileston v. UllmanSearch
-
and Barrows v. JacksonSearch
-
See Baker v. CarrSearch
-
be expected properly to frame the issues and present them with the necessary adversarial zeal. See, e.g., Craig v. BorenSearch
-
U.S. at 413 U. S. 612 , quoting Dombrowski v. PfisterSearch
-
See Broadrick v. OklahomaSearch
-
to allege that, as applied to others, the statute might be unconstitutional. See Parker v. LevySearch
-
We therefore move on to the merits of Munson's First Amendment claim. III The Merits. In Schaumburg v. CitizensSearch
-
distinguished a case in which a percentage limitation on solicitation costs had been upheld, see National Foundation v. FortSearch
-
U.S. at 444 U. S. 635 , quoting from Page 467 U. S. 964 Citizens for a Better Environment v. SchaumburgSearch
-
statute . . . covers a whole range of easily identifiable and constitutionally proscribable . . . conduct. . . .' CSC v. LetterSearch
-
U.S. at 417 U. S. 760 . See also New York v. FerberSearch
-
First National Bank of Boston v. BellottiSearch
-
U. S. 765 , 435 U. S. 786 (1978). See also Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. PublicSearch
-
City Council of Los Angeles v. TaxpayersSearch
-
citing Erznoznik v. CitySearch
-
if it cannot satisfy the percentage limitation, the chill on the protected activity is the same. See Chaplinsky v. NewSearch
-
requirement is jurisdictional here, we must satisfy ourselves that the requirements of Art. III are met. Doremus v. BoardSearch
-
an abstract, generalized grievance that the courts are neither well equipped nor well advised to adjudicate. See Warth v. SeldinSearch
-
Schlesinger v. ReservistsSearch
-
Munson is paid to disseminate information does not, in itself, render its activity unprotected. See New York Times Co. v. SullivanSearch
-
Bates v. StateSearch
-
because application of those rules would have an intolerable, inhibitory effect on freedom of speech. E.g., Thornhill v. AlabamaSearch
-
U. S. 88 , 310 U. S. 97 -98 (1940). See United States v. RainesSearch
-
organization so that a member of the public could make an informed decision about whether to contribute. Schaumburg v. CitizensSearch
-
license, such a statute creates a threat of censorship that, by its very existence, chills free speech. See Thornhill v. AlabamaSearch
-
Lovell v. GriffinSearch
-
for Vincent, 466 U. S. 789 , 466 U. S. 797 (1984). See, e.g., Stromberg v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U. S. 444 (1938). See also New York v. FerberSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Sec'y of State of Md. v. MunsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial