Citation network
United States Vs. Yermian
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 27, 1984
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 63 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. YermianSearch
-
U.S. 63 (1984) United States v. YermianSearch
-
by the three other Courts of Appeals Page 468 U. S. 68 that have considered the issue. United States v. BakerSearch
-
United States v. LewisSearch
-
Interpreting that provision in United States v. CohnSearch
-
to require proof of actual knowledge of federal involvement. As this Court observed in United States v. BramblettSearch
-
actual knowledge requirement, we have no occasion to apply the principle of lenity urged by the dissent. See McElroy v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. GodwinSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Accord, United States v. LichtensteinSearch
-
actually knew that the statements were false at the Page 468 U. S. 76 time he made them. See Bryson v. UnitedSearch
-
every thing from which aid can be derived,' United States v. FisherSearch
-
Ladner v. UnitedSearch
-
Rewis v. UnitedSearch
-
Emphasis added.) The majority correctly begins its analysis with the language of the statute, see United States v. TurketteSearch
-
in a statute, United States v. TurketteSearch
-
the 1948 revision of the statute -- a housekeeping overhaul intended to make no substantive changes, United States v. BramblettSearch
-
language -- language which this Court, in United States v. CohnSearch
-
veto changes to alter the culpability requirement that had been a part of the Act since 1918. Indeed in United States v. GillilandSearch
-
Williams v. UnitedSearch
-
Dayton Board of Education v. BrinkmanSearch
-
to decide the issue itself, I believe that, at a minimum, it must remand for a decision on the issue, see Dandridge v. WilliamsSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. YermianSearch
-
United States v. BakerSearch
-
See McElroy v. UnitedSearch
-
See Bryson v. UnitedSearch
-
Dayton Board of Education v. BrinkmanSearch
-
Dandridge v. WilliamsSearch
-
United States v. FisherSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial