Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Allen Vs. Wright

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jul 03, 1984

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

69 entries 10 linked 59 unlinked
Show
  1. Norwood Vs. Harrison US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1973
    Relied / Followed
  2. Warth Vs. Seldin US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1975
  3. O'Shea Vs. Littleton US Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1974
  4. Flast Vs. Cohen US Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1968
  5. United States Vs. Scrap US Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1973
  6. United States Vs. Richardson US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1974
  7. Rizzo Vs. Goode US Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1976
  8. Heckler Vs. Mathews US Supreme Court · Mar 05, 1984
  9. Cafeteria Workers Vs. Mcelroy US Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1961
  10. Sampson Vs. Murray US Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1974
  11. U.S. 737 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court Allen v. Wright
    Search
  12. U.S. 737 (1984) Allen v. Wright
    Search
  13. d) None of the cases relied on by the Court of Appeals and by respondents to establish standing -- Gilmore v. City
    Search
  14. and Coit v. Green
    Search
  15. U.S. 997, summarily aff'g Green v. Connally
    Search
  16. stage of this litigation that their children have ever applied or would ever apply to any private school. See Wright v. Regan
    Search
  17. relief would be contrary to the will of Congress expressed in the 1979 ban on strengthening IRS guidelines. Wright v. Miller
    Search
  18. reversed, concluding that respondents have standing to maintain this lawsuit. The court acknowledged that Simon v. Eastern
    Search
  19. this denigration injury enough to give respondents standing, since it was this injury which supported standing in Coit v. Green
    Search
  20. U.S. 997 (1971), summarily aff'g Green v. Connally
    Search
  21. and Gilmore v. City
    Search
  22. As the Court explained in Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans
    Search
  23. Vander Jagt v. O'Neill
    Search
  24. Gladstone, Realtors v. Village
    Search
  25. of Bellwood, 441 U. S. 91 , 441 U. S. 100 (1979) (quoting Warth v. Seldin
    Search
  26. Los Angeles v. Lyons
    Search
  27. to follow from a favorable decision. See Simon v. Eastern
    Search
  28. of the particular complaint to those made in prior standing Page 468 U. S. 752 cases. See, e.g., Los Angeles v. Lyons
    Search
  29. Chicago & Grand Trunk R. Co. v. Wellman
    Search
  30. in accordance with law is not sufficient, standing alone, to confer jurisdiction on a federal court. In Schlesinger v. Reservists
    Search
  31. made no law respecting an establishment of religion, id. at 454 U. S. 482 (quoting Americans United v. U.S
    Search
  32. U.S. at 454 U. S. 483 . See also United States v. Richardson
    Search
  33. of discriminatory government action, and is sufficient in some circumstances to support standing. See Heckler v. Mathews
    Search
  34. by the challenged discriminatory conduct, ibid. In Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis
    Search
  35. membership policies, because he had never applied for membership. Id. at 407 U. S. 166 -167. In O'Shea v. Littleton
    Search
  36. had been, or would likely be, subject to the challenged practices. The Court denied standing on similar facts in Rizzo v. Goode
    Search
  37. unlike the appellee in Heckler v. Mathews
    Search
  38. a racially integrated school -- is, beyond any doubt, not only judicially cognizable but, as shown by cases from Brown v. Board
    Search
  39. of Education, 347 U. S. 483 (1954), to Bob Jones University v. United
    Search
  40. Simon v. Eastern
    Search
  41. Kentucky Welfare Rights Org., 426 U.S. at 426 U. S. 42 . As the Court pointed out in Warth v. Seldin
    Search
  42. conduct and the asserted injury are far too weak for the chain as a whole to sustain respondents' standing. In Simon v. Eastern
    Search
  43. the plaintiffs' injury and the challenged Government action. Id. at 426 U. S. 40 -46. See also Warth v. Seldin
    Search
  44. of the IRS. Simon v. Eastern
    Search
  45. U.S. at 408 U. S. 15 . See also Gilligan v. Morgan
    Search
  46. J., concurring). The same concern for the proper role of the federal courts is reflected in cases like O'Shea v. Littleton
    Search
  47. U. S. 488 (1974), Rizzo v. Goode
    Search
  48. U. S. 362 (1976), and Los Angeles v. Lyons
    Search
  49. business. Id. at 461 U. S. 112 . Case-or-controversy considerations, the Court observed in O'Shea v. Littleton
    Search
  50. Page 468 U. S. 761 have standing. Most relevant to this case is the principle articulated in Rizzo v. Goode
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial