Citation network
United States Vs. Leon
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jul 05, 1984
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 897 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. LeonSearch
-
U.S. 897 (1984) United States v. LeonSearch
-
Alderman v. UnitedSearch
-
the information provided by the informant was inadequate under both prongs of the two-part test established in Aguilar v. TexasSearch
-
U. S. 108 (1964), and Spinelli v. UnitedSearch
-
test announced last Term in Illinois v. GatesSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Justices has sometimes implied that the exclusionary rule is a necessary corollary of the Fourth Amendment, Mapp v. PageSearch
-
Olmstead v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 462 -463 (1928), or that the rule is required by the conjunction of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
Agnello v. UnitedSearch
-
not detain us long. The Fifth Amendment theory has not withstood critical analysis or the test of time, see Andresen v. MarylandSearch
-
of the benefit conferred on such guilty defendants offends basic concepts of the criminal justice system. Stone v. PowellSearch
-
Stone v. PowellSearch
-
U.S. at 462 U. S. 255 (WHITE, J., concurring in judgment). In Stone v. PowellSearch
-
federal habeas relief on the ground that unlawfully obtained evidence had been introduced at his trial. Cf. Rose v. MitchellSearch
-
than the criminal trial itself have been evaluated and rejected under the same analytic approach. In United States v. CalandraSearch
-
U.S. at 414 U. S. 348 . Similarly, in United States v. JanisSearch
-
the prosecution seeks to use the fruits of an illegal search or seizure against the victim of police misconduct. Rakas v. IllinoisSearch
-
Brown v. UnitedSearch
-
Wong Sun v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 371 U. S. 471 , 371 U. S. 491 -492 (1963). Cf. United States v. PaynerSearch
-
and inadmissible in the prosecution's case in chief may be used to impeach a defendant's direct testimony. Walder v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 347 U. S. 62 (1954). See also Oregon v. HassSearch
-
Harris v. NewSearch
-
of the ends of the exclusionary rule led us to conclude in United States v. HavensSearch
-
inadmissible any evidence that came to light through a chain of causation that began with an illegal arrest. Brown v. IllinoisSearch
-
witness' testimony may be admitted even when his identity was discovered in an unconstitutional search. United States v. CeccoliniSearch
-
considerations relating to the exclusionary rule and the constitutional principles it is designed to protect. Dunaway v. NewSearch
-
Brown v. IllinoisSearch
-
an assessment of the flagrancy of the police misconduct constitutes an important step in the calculus. Dunaway v. NewSearch
-
a substantive criminal statute that subsequently Page 468 U. S. 912 is declared unconstitutional. Michigan v. DeFillippoSearch
-
unwilling to conclude that new Fourth Amendment principles are always to have only prospective effect, United States v. JohnsonSearch
-
has been applied retroactively. See United States v. PeltierSearch
-
Desist v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. LeonSearch
-
Aguilar v. TexasSearch
-
and Spinelli v. UnitedSearch
-
of the Fourth Amendment, Mapp v. PageSearch
-
of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
Andresen v. MarylandSearch
-
In Stone v. PowellSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial