Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Gray Vs. Lucas

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1983

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

34 entries 7 linked 27 unlinked
Show
  1. Estelle Vs. Gamble US Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1976
  2. Gregg Vs. Georgia US Supreme Court · Jul 02, 1976
  3. Furman Vs. Georgia US Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1972
  4. Enmund Vs. Florida US Supreme Court · Jul 02, 1982
  5. Trop Vs. Dulles US Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1958
  6. Townsend Vs. Sain US Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1963
  7. Barefoot Vs. Estelle US Supreme Court · Jul 06, 1983
  8. U.S. 1237 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court Gray v. Lucas
    Search
  9. U.S. 1237 (1983) Gray v. Lucas
    Search
  10. Gray v. State
    Search
  11. and sentenced to death. (4) The Mississippi Supreme Court affirmed both the conviction and the death sentence. Gray v. State
    Search
  12. So.2d 994 (Miss.1979). (5) We denied petitioner's petitions for certiorari and rehearing. Gray v. Mississippi
    Search
  13. relief. (8) The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed and denied petitioner's motion for rehearing. Gray v. Lucas
    Search
  14. Gray v. Lucas
    Search
  15. Gray v. Page
    Search
  16. U. S. 97 , 429 U. S. 102 (1976) (quoting Trop v. Dulles
    Search
  17. associated with those traditional methods was not so great as to render the former constitutionally infirm. Gray v. Lucas
    Search
  18. U. S. 782 , 457 U. S. 788 (1982) (quoting Coker v. Georgia
    Search
  19. are moving. Enmund v. Florida
    Search
  20. Mississippi's method of execution. The Court of Appeals has denied petitioner a hearing to develop his claim. Townsend v. Sain
    Search
  21. s death sentence in accordance with my view that the death penalty is unconstitutional in all circumstances. Gregg v. Georgia
    Search
  22. in state court proceedings, and therefore had forfeited his right to raise the issue in federal court. Wainwright v. Sykes
    Search
  23. the claim, and it would be an abuse of the writ for him to try to raise it in his current habeas petition. See Sanders v. United
    Search
  24. means by which he will die simply because his attorney neglected to append the claim to an earlier petition. See Fay v. Noia
    Search
  25. Sanders v. United
    Search
  26. States, supra, at 373 U. S. 17 -18. Relying on this Court's recent opinion in Barefoot v. Estelle
    Search
  27. A similar situation was presented in Enmund v. Florida
    Search
  28. U.S. Supreme Court Gray v. Lucas
    Search
  29. Gray v. State
    Search
  30. Gray v. Mississippi
    Search
  31. Coker v. Georgia
    Search
  32. Wainwright v. Sykes
    Search
  33. See Sanders v. United
    Search
  34. See Fay v. Noia
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial