Citation network
Marshall Vs. Lonberger
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 22, 1983
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 422 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court Marshall v. LonbergerSearch
-
U.S. 422 (1983) Marshall v. LonbergerSearch
-
or at one of the Illinois presentencing proceedings, of the charges on which he was indicted in Illinois. Henderson v. MorganSearch
-
U. S. 436 -438. (c) Because respondent's prior conviction was valid, this case is controlled by Spencer v. TexasSearch
-
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which granted respondent's petition for a writ of habeas corpus, Lonberger v. JagoSearch
-
F.2d 1189 (1980), and Lonberger v. JagoSearch
-
previous Illinois felony charge, offered and admitted into evidence at his Ohio murder trial, was invalid under Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
rendered respondent's ensuing conviction in that proceeding unconstitutional under this Court's decision in Burgett v. TexasSearch
-
U. S. 109 (1967). The State claims that the Court of Appeals exceeded its authority, under our holding in Sumner v. MataSearch
-
constitutionally infirm. We granted certiorari to consider, inter alia, the interrelationship between Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
supra, and Henderson v. MorganSearch
-
Sixth Circuit reversed the judgment of the District Court, and ordered that a writ of habeas corpus issue. Lonberger v. JagoSearch
-
certiorari, vacated the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remanded for reconsideration in the light of Sumner v. MataSearch
-
U. S. 539 (1981). Marshall v. LonbergerSearch
-
U.S. 902 (1981). On remand, the Court of Appeals adhered to its previous decision. Lonberger v. JagoSearch
-
d)(8). Sumner v. MataSearch
-
stated. The question of an effective waiver of a federal constitutional right is governed by federal standards. Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
an incomplete understanding of the charge that his plea cannot stand as an intelligent admission of guilt.' Henderson v. MorganSearch
-
U. S. 637 , 426 U. S. 645 n. 13 . . . (1976). Accord, Smith v. O'GradySearch
-
whether a plea of guilty is voluntary for purposes of the Federal Constitution is a question of federal law, Henderson v. MorganSearch
-
Court of Appeals explicitly credited Lonberger's testimony in a footnote rejecting the State's reliance on Henderson v. MorganSearch
-
d). In LaVallee v. DelleSearch
-
credibility of the defendant. We think the same is true in the present case. The assumption referred to in Townsend v. SainSearch
-
U. S. 293 , 372 U. S. 314 -315 (1963), quoted in LaVallee v. DelleSearch
-
credibility of witnesses whose demeanor has been observed by the state trial court, but not by them. In United States v. OregonSearch
-
Boyd v. BoydSearch
-
U. S. 329 , 312 U. S. 334 (1941), quoted in Henderson v. MorganSearch
-
U.S. at 426 U. S. 645 . In Henderson v. MorganSearch
-
in the constitutional meaning of that term. We think that the application of the principles enunciated in Henderson v. MorganSearch
-
in the Ohio murder trial of the conviction based on that plea deprived respondent of no federal right. Spencer v. TexasSearch
-
as recognized in Parker v. RandolphSearch
-
Cf. Sandstrom v. MontanaSearch
-
supra, at 442 U. S. 74 -75, that the jury will be unable to follow its instructions. See, e.g., Bruton v. UnitedSearch
-
malice, motive, and plan -- whose application is left largely to the discretion of the trial judge, see Spencer v. TexasSearch
-
has been fully considered in cases such as Spencer, supra, Bruton, supra, Parker, supra, and Burgett v. TexasSearch
-
as this by our decision in Spencer, supra, in which the Court quoted the remark of Justice Cardozo in Snyder v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Remarking on the state of the law of evidence with respect to reputation in criminal cases, the Court in Michelson v. UnitedSearch
-
at 459 U. S. 438 , and n. 6. I The bulk of the Court's opinion is devoted not to defending Spencer v. TexasSearch
-
U. S. 554 (1967), but rather to establishing that this case is not governed on all fours by Burgett v. TexasSearch
-
to which he pleads guilty renders his plea invalid, and a conviction based upon it unconstitutional. See Henderson v. MorganSearch
-
him with attempted murder. The Court resolves this tension on the basis of rules of law derived from Sumner v. MataSearch
-
U. S. 539 (1981), and on dictum in Henderson v. MorganSearch
-
Ante at 459 U. S. 437 -438. Under Sumner v. MataSearch
-
rule forbidding convictions -- not merely punishments -- for two offenses based on a single act. See People v. KingSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Marshall v. LonbergerSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial