Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Perry Educ. Ass'n Vs. Perry Educators' Ass'n

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 23, 1983

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

65 entries 7 linked 58 unlinked
Show
  1. Healy Vs. James US Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1972
  2. Cantwell Vs. Connecticut US Supreme Court · May 20, 1940
  3. Schneider Vs. State US Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1939
  4. Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. Vs. Conrad US Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1975
  5. Pell Vs. Procunier US Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1974
    Relied / Followed
  6. Widmar Vs. Vincent US Supreme Court · Dec 08, 1981
  7. Greer Vs. Spock US Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1976
  8. Perry Educ. Ass'n v. Perry
    Search
  9. Educators' Ass'n - 460 U.S. 37 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court Perry Educ. Ass'n v. Perry
    Search
  10. Educators' Ass'n, 460 U.S. 37 (1983) Perry Education Association v. Perry
    Search
  11. clearly found in the special responsibilities of an exclusive bargaining representative. Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley
    Search
  12. U. S. 92 , and Carey v. Brown
    Search
  13. motions for summary judgment, the District Court entered judgment for the defendants. Perry Local Educators' Assn. v. Hohlt
    Search
  14. C (SD Ind., Feb. 25, 1980). The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed. Perry Local Educators' Assn. v. Hohlt
    Search
  15. King Manufacturing Co. v. City
    Search
  16. purposes, Doran v. Salem
    Search
  17. McCollum v. Board
    Search
  18. Hamilton v. Regents
    Search
  19. action. We have previously emphasized that statutes authorizing appeals are to be strictly construed, Fornaris v. Ridge
    Search
  20. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See, e.g., Lockwood v. Jefferson
    Search
  21. Palmore v. United
    Search
  22. Tinker v. Des
    Search
  23. s guarantee of free speech applies to teacher's mailboxes as surely as it does elsewhere within the school, Tinker v. Des
    Search
  24. Moines School District, supra, and on sidewalks outside, Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley
    Search
  25. Grayned v. City
    Search
  26. Hague v. CIO
    Search
  27. regulation is necessary to serve a compelling state interest and that it is narrowly drawn to achieve that end. Carey v. Brown
    Search
  28. government interest, and leave open ample alternative channels of communication. United States Postal Service v. Council
    Search
  29. Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public
    Search
  30. from a forum generally open to the public even if it was not required to create the forum in the first place. Widmar v. Vincent
    Search
  31. City of Madison Joint School District v. Wisconsin
    Search
  32. permissible, and a content-based prohibition must be narrowly drawn to effectuate a compelling state interest. Widmar v. Vincent
    Search
  33. United States Postal Service v. Council
    Search
  34. Id. at 453 U. S. 129 -130, quoting Greer v. Spock
    Search
  35. U. S. 828 , 424 U. S. 836 (1976), in turn quoting Adderley v. Florida
    Search
  36. Perry Local Educators' Assn. v. Hohlt
    Search
  37. use the facilities. This type of selective access does not transform government property into a public forum. In Greer v. Spock
    Search
  38. had sometimes been invited to appear at Fort Dix did not convert the military base into a public forum. And in Lehman v. City
    Search
  39. Connecticut State Federation of Teachers v. Board
    Search
  40. Abood v. Detroit
    Search
  41. other nonpublic Page 460 U. S. 54 forum cases where we have upheld restrictions on access. See, e.g., Greer v. Spock
    Search
  42. action impinges upon a fundamental right protected by the Constitution. See San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez
    Search
  43. See supra at 460 U. S. 51 -52. The Seventh Circuit and PLEA rely on Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley
    Search
  44. U. S. 92 (1972), and Carey v. Brown
    Search
  45. facility, the difference in status between the exclusive bargaining representative and its rival is such a distinction. v. The
    Search
  46. See Perry Local Educators' Assn. v. Hohlt
    Search
  47. Pike Independent Professional Educators v. Metropolitan
    Search
  48. PEA's reliance upon Abood v. Detroit
    Search
  49. state statute authorizing the negotiation of agency shop agreements was at issue. See Juris.Statement in Abood v. Detroit
    Search
  50. by all but one other federal or state court to consider the issue. See Connecticut State Federation of Teachers v. Board
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial