Citation network
United States Vs. Knotts
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 02, 1983
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 276 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. KnottsSearch
-
U.S. 276 (1983) United States v. KnottsSearch
-
certiorari, 457 U.S. 1131 (1982), and we now reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. II In Olmstead v. UnitedSearch
-
and therefore a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Id. at 277 U. S. 478 . Nearly 40 years later, in Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
Ibid. In Smith v. MarylandSearch
-
under the circumstances. Id. at 389 U. S. 353 . See Rakas v. IllinoisSearch
-
United States v. WhiteSearch
-
U. S. 583 , 417 U. S. 590 (1974) (plurality opinion). See also Rakas v. IllinoisSearch
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 333 U. S. 10 , 333 U. S. 14 (1948), quoted with approval in Payton v. NewSearch
-
Hester v. UnitedSearch
-
upon them at birth with such enhancement as science and technology afforded them in this case. In United States v. LeeSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
to deal with another claim which was to some extent a factual counterpart of respondent's assertions here. In Smith v. MarylandSearch
-
Zurcher v. StanfordSearch
-
outside the cabin. Just as notions of physical trespass based on the law of real property were not dispositive in Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 389 U. S. 347 (1967), neither were they dispositive in Hester v. UnitedSearch
-
a challenge. We note that, while several Courts of Appeals have approved warrantless installations, see United States v. BernardSearch
-
United States v. LewisSearch
-
United States v. BruneauSearch
-
United States v. MiroyanSearch
-
United States v. CheshireSearch
-
United States v. AelSearch
-
United States v. HuffordSearch
-
by respondent's compatriot, but also its original installation. See ante at 460 U. S. 279 , n. Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
even when those invasions are not accompanied by physical intrusions. Cases such as Silverman v. UnitedSearch
-
arranging that he be sold an object that, unknown to him, already has a beeper installed inside it. Cf. Gouled v. UnitedSearch
-
Lewis v. UnitedSearch
-
for me the formalism and confusion in this Court's recent attempts to redefine Fourth Amendment standing. See Rawlings v. KentuckySearch
-
doctrine, and twice cites Hester v. UnitedSearch
-
concerning the open fields doctrine have been accepted by the Court for argument and plenary consideration. State v. BradySearch
-
United States v. OliverSearch
-
F.2d 356 (CA6 1982), cert. granted, 459 U.S. 1168 (1983). See also United States v. DunnSearch
-
Ibid. But the Court held to the contrary in Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. KnottsSearch
-
of the Court of Appeals. II In Olmstead v. UnitedSearch
-
Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
See Rakas v. IllinoisSearch
-
Payton v. NewSearch
-
In United States v. LeeSearch
-
In Smith v. MarylandSearch
-
United States v. BernardSearch
-
Silverman v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Gouled v. UnitedSearch
-
See Rawlings v. KentuckySearch
-
State v. BradySearch
-
United States v. CurtisSearch
-
United States v. DunnSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial