Citation network
Florida Vs. Royer
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 23, 1983
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 491 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court Florida v. RoyerSearch
-
U.S. 491 (1983) Florida v. RoyerSearch
-
his consent to search was obtained, the involuntary detention had exceeded the limited restraint permitted by Terry v. OhioSearch
-
that the involuntary detention had exceeded the limited restraint permitted by Terry v. OhioSearch
-
The nomenclature used to describe Royer's confinement, the court found, was unimportant, because, under Dunaway v. NewSearch
-
given, a burden that is not satisfied by showing a mere submission to a claim of lawful authority. Lo-Ji Sales, Inc. v. NewSearch
-
Bumper v. NorthSearch
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
Amos v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
to listen, or by offering in evidence in a criminal prosecution his voluntary answers to such questions. See Dunaway v. NewSearch
-
without more, convert the encounter into a seizure requiring some level of objective justification. United States v. MendenhallSearch
-
indeed, he may decline to listen to the questions at all, and may go on his way. Terry v. OhioSearch
-
and his refusal to listen or answer does not, without more, furnish those grounds. United States v. MendenhallSearch
-
clear that not all seizures of the person must be justified by probable cause to arrest for a crime. Prior to Terry v. OhioSearch
-
to a seizure for the purposes of the Fourth Amendment was invalid unless justified by probable cause. Dunaway v. NewSearch
-
or is about to commit a crime. In that case, a stop and a frisk for weapons were found unexceptionable. Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
in a nearby vehicle was carrying narcotics and a gun. Although not expressly authorized in Terry, United States v. Brignoni-PonceSearch
-
U. S. 499 involved is the suppression of illegal transactions in drugs or of any other serious crime. Michigan v. SummersSearch
-
effects. Nor may the police seek to verify their suspicions by means that approach the conditions of arrest. Dunaway v. NewSearch
-
interrogation, even though the interrogation is investigative. Id. at 442 U. S. 211 -212. Brown v. IllinoisSearch
-
U. S. 590 (1975), and Davis v. MississippiSearch
-
concerns for the safety of the officer and to prevent the destruction of evidence by the arrestee. E.g., Chimel v. CaliforniaSearch
-
to the person of the arrestee and the area immediately within his control. Id. at 395 U. S. 762 . Terry v. OhioSearch
-
U.S. at 392 U. S. 19 , quoting Warden v. HaydenSearch
-
reasonably available to verify or dispel the officer's suspicion in a short period of time. See, e.g., United States v. Brignoni-PonceSearch
-
Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
given, if they are the product of the illegal detention and not the result of an independent act of free will. Dunaway v. NewSearch
-
Brown v. IllinoisSearch
-
at 422 U. S. 601 -602. In this respect, those cases reiterated one of the principal holdings of Wong Sun v. UnitedSearch
-
s consent, if voluntary, would have been effective to legalize the search of his two suitcases. Cf. United States v. WatsonSearch
-
of the encounter had evaporated, and we cannot fault the Florida District Court of Appeal for concluding that Terry v. OhioSearch
-
detention, such as from an airport concourse to a more Page 460 U. S. 505 private area. Cf. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSearch
-
s custody by proving probable cause, and hence removing any barrier to relying on Royer's consent to search. Peters v. NewSearch
-
York, decided with Sibron v. NewSearch
-
name and carrying two heavy American Tourister bags may be arrested and held to answer for a serious felony charge. v. BecauseSearch
-
the stop authorized by Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Our decision here is consistent with the Court's judgment in United States v. MendenhallSearch
-
is necessary to justify this kind of a warrantless search, if indeed it is a search. See, e.g., United States v. SullivanSearch
-
United States v. BealeSearch
-
United States v. GoldsteinSearch
-
F.2d 356, 361 (CA5), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 962 (1981). See United States v. VieraSearch
-
to September 30, 1981, are binding precedent on the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Bonner v. CitySearch
-
prolonged detention of either Royer or his luggage which may involve other Fourth Amendment concerns. In United State v. BealeSearch
-
case similar in its general setting to that before us in United States v. MendenhallSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial