Citation network
PG and E Vs. State Energy Comm'n
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 20, 1983
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
PG & E v. StateSearch
-
Energy Comm'n - 461 U.S. 190 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court PG & E v. StateSearch
-
Energy Comm'n, 461 U.S. 190 (1983) Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. StateSearch
-
Id. at 419 U. S. 143 , quoting Pennsylvania v. WestSearch
-
Duke Power Co. v. CarolinaSearch
-
that, within constitutional limits, Congress may preempt state authority by so stating in express terms. Jones v. RathSearch
-
la Cuesta, 458 U. S. 141 , 458 U. S. 153 (1982), quoting Rice v. SantaSearch
-
Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Frost v. CorporationSearch
-
Jackson v. MetropolitanSearch
-
Edison Co., 419 U. S. 345 , 419 U. S. 357 (1974). See Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. PublicSearch
-
As we noted in Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NaturalSearch
-
Rice v. SantaSearch
-
for licensing of private construction, ownership, and operation of commercial nuclear power reactors. Duke Power Co. v. CarolinaSearch
-
Power Reactor Development Co. v. ElectricalSearch
-
to allow a municipality to prohibit transmission lines necessary for the AEC's own activities. Maun v. UnitedSearch
-
place considerable confidence in the interpretations of state law reached by the federal courts of appeals. Cf. Mills v. RogersSearch
-
California's true motive. First, inquiry into legislative motive is often an unsatisfactory venture. United States v. O'BrienSearch
-
availability of interim storage, it could continue to license new reactors. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. NRCSearch
-
Page 461 U. S. 221 Hines v. DavidowitzSearch
-
i). Duke Power Co. v. CarolinaSearch
-
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NaturalSearch
-
Minnesota v. NRCSearch
-
to challenge the waste disposal law and that the law was preempted by the Atomic Energy Act. Pacific Legal Foundation v. StateSearch
-
The certification scheme, in general, does not have an 'immediate and substantial impact' on the utilities. Gardner v. ToiletSearch
-
Our summary affirmance in Northern States Power Co. v. MinnesotaSearch
-
Petitioners correctly cite Perez v. CampbellSearch
-
this issue. Nor was the issue raised in the review of the NRC's decision in Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. NRCSearch
-
of prolonged litigation, and is presently pending before the Court. See Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. NRCSearch
-
U.S.App.D.C. 336, 547 E.2d 633 (1976), rev'd sub nom. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NaturalSearch
-
on remand, 222 U.S.App.D.C. 9, 685 F.2d 459 (1982), cert. granted sub nom. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. NaturalSearch
-
a fuel source preempted state legislation that may have an adverse effect on the use of coal. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaSearch
-
Our resolution of this case is not controlled by First Iowa Hydro-Electric Cooperative v. FPCSearch
-
not proceed and a State nevertheless chose to go ahead with construction. Cf. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court PG & E v. StateSearch
-
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. StateSearch
-
Pennsylvania v. WestSearch
-
Jones v. RathSearch
-
See Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. PublicSearch
-
Power Reactor Development Co. v. ElectricalSearch
-
Maun v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Mills v. RogersSearch
-
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. NRCSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial