Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Connick Vs. Myers

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 20, 1983

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

65 entries 14 linked 51 unlinked
Show
  1. Perry Vs. Sindermann US Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1972
  2. Branti Vs. Finkel US Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1980
  3. United States Vs. Wurzbach US Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1930
  4. Torcaso Vs. Watkins US Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1961
  5. New York Times Co. Vs. Sullivan US Supreme Court · Mar 09, 1964
  6. Garrison Vs. Louisiana US Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1964
  7. Bishop Vs. Wood US Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1976
  8. New York Vs. Ferber US Supreme Court · Jul 02, 1982
  9. Elrod Vs. Burns US Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1976
  10. Time, Inc. Vs. Hill US Supreme Court · Jan 09, 1967
  11. Shelton Vs. Tucker US Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1960
  12. Sherbert Vs. Verner US Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1963
  13. Arnett Vs. Kennedy US Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1974
  14. Cox Broadcasting Corp. Vs. Cohn US Supreme Court · Mar 03, 1975
  15. U.S. 138 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court Connick v. Myers
    Search
  16. U.S. 138 (1983) Connick v. Myers
    Search
  17. Pickering v. Board
    Search
  18. U. S. 156 . Page 461 U. S. 140 JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court. In Pickering v. Board
    Search
  19. on a basis that infringes the employee's constitutionally protected interest in freedom of expression. Keyishian v. Board
    Search
  20. McAuliffe v. Mayor
    Search
  21. Mass. 216, 220, 29 N.E. 517, 517 (1892). For many years, Holmes' epigram expressed this Court's law. Adler v. Board
    Search
  22. Garner v. Los
    Search
  23. Public Workers v. Mitchell
    Search
  24. teachers, to swear oaths of loyalty to the State and reveal the groups with which they associated. In Wiemann v. Updegraff
    Search
  25. to establish their loyalty by extracting an oath denying past affiliation with Communists. In Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy
    Search
  26. that the government could not deny employment because of previous membership in a particular party. See also Shelton v. Tucker
    Search
  27. Cramp v. Board
    Search
  28. of Public Instruction, 368 U. S. 278 (1961). By the time Sherbert v. Verner
    Search
  29. Id. at 374 U. S. 404 . It was therefore no surprise when, in Keyishian v. Board
    Search
  30. Roth v. United
    Search
  31. and is entitled to special protection. NAACP v. Claiborne
    Search
  32. U. S. 455 , 447 U. S. 467 (1980). Pickering v. Board
    Search
  33. following Pickering also involved safeguarding speech on matters of public concern. The controversy in Perry v. Sindermann
    Search
  34. the college should be elevated to 4-year status -- a change opposed by the Regents. In Mt. Healthy City Board of Ed. v. Page
    Search
  35. indeed, the radio station promptly announced the adoption of the dress code as a news item. Most recently, in Givhan v. Western
    Search
  36. the reasons for the dismissal are alleged to be mistaken or unreasonable. Page 461 U. S. 147 Board of Regents v. Roth
    Search
  37. Mine Workers v. Illinois
    Search
  38. Bar Assn., 389 U. S. 217 , 389 U. S. 223 (1967), quoting Thomas v. Collins
    Search
  39. obscenity, that the State can prohibit and punish such expression by all persons in its jurisdiction. See Chaplinsky v. New
    Search
  40. wisdom of a personnel decision taken by a public agency allegedly in reaction to the employee's behavior. Cf. Bishop v. Wood
    Search
  41. of the worker's own choice constitutes a coercion of belief in violation of fundamental constitutional rights. Branti v. Finkel
    Search
  42. in this country that government service should depend upon meritorious performance, rather than political service. CSC v. Letter
    Search
  43. Ex parte Curtis, 106 U.S. at 106 U. S. 373 . As JUSTICE POWELL explained in his separate opinion in Arnett v. Kennedy
    Search
  44. Also relevant is the manner, time, and place in which the questionnaire was distributed. As noted in Givhan v. Western
    Search
  45. thus does not constitute a sufficient defense under Mt. Healthy Page 461 U. S. 154 City Board of Ed. v. Doyle
    Search
  46. See Perry v. Sindermann
    Search
  47. Mt. Healthy City Board of Ed. v. Doyle
    Search
  48. Givhan v. Western
    Search
  49. Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
    Search
  50. U.S. Supreme Court Connick v. Myers
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial