Citation network
United States Vs. Rogers
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 31, 1983
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 677 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. RogersSearch
-
U.S. 677 (1983) United States v. RogersSearch
-
U. S. 683 chooses, to go to court if he claims that the assessed amount was not legally owing. See generally Bull v. UnitedSearch
-
and certain enforcement of the tax laws in a system relying primarily on self-reporting. See G. M. Leasing Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. SecuritySearch
-
Bull v. UnitedSearch
-
left to state law, the consequences that attach to those interests is a matter left to federal law. See United States v. MitchellSearch
-
United States v. UnionSearch
-
Aquilino v. UnitedSearch
-
Springer v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
The substance of Texas law related to the homestead right may usefully be divided into two categories. Cf. Woods v. AlvaradoSearch
-
interests and vesting in each spouse an interest akin to an undivided life estate in the property. See Williams v. WilliamsSearch
-
Paddock v. SiemoneitSearch
-
Hill v. HillSearch
-
United States v. RogersSearch
-
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and resulted in opinions issued on the same day. United States v. RogersSearch
-
Ingram v. DallasSearch
-
in any cotenancy in which unindebted third parties share an ownership interest with a delinquent taxpayer. See Folsom v. UnitedSearch
-
flies in the face of the plain meaning of the statute. See, e.g., United States v. TrillingSearch
-
Washington v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. OvermanSearch
-
United States v. KocherSearch
-
Mansfield v. ExcelsiorSearch
-
generally held to cut off as well dower or homestead rights possessed by the delinquent taxpayer's spouse. See Lucas v. PurdySearch
-
Robbins v. BarronSearch
-
Jones v. DevoreSearch
-
any right, superior to that of other creditors, to disturb the settled expectations of innocent third parties. Folsom v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Bull v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. United States v. OvermanSearch
-
Cf. United States v. GeneralSearch
-
and in our decisions in United States v. MitchellSearch
-
and United States v. BessSearch
-
itself. Accord, United States v. OvermanSearch
-
Herndon v. UnitedSearch
-
statute, and we decline to frustrate the policy of the statute by reading such an exception into it. Cf. Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSearch
-
United States v. MitchellSearch
-
is as potent in its application to innocent bystanders as in its application to delinquent debtors. See United States v. UnionSearch
-
Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSearch
-
embodied traditional limitations on the rights of lienholders, however, then we would have to conclude that Folsom v. UnitedSearch
-
to exercise a degree of equitable discretion and refuse to authorize a forced sale in a particular case. See Tillery v. ParksSearch
-
United States v. EavesSearch
-
United States v. HershbergerSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. RogersSearch
-
See G. M. Leasing Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. MitchellSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial