Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Baltimore G. and E. Co. Vs. Nrdc

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 06, 1983

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

36 entries 36 unlinked
Show
  1. Baltimore G. & E. Co. v. NRDC
    Search
  2. U.S. 87 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court Baltimore G. & E. Co. v. NRDC
    Search
  3. U.S. 87 (1983) Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural
    Search
  4. because of perceived inadequacies in the rulemaking procedures. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. NRC
    Search
  5. to support the zero release assumption. Id. at 361, 547 F.2d at 658. In Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural
    Search
  6. potentially affect the outcome of any decision to license a particular plant. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. NRC
    Search
  7. will inform the public that it has indeed considered environmental concerns in its decisionmaking process. Weinberger v. Catholic
    Search
  8. to elevate environmental concerns over other appropriate considerations. See Stryckers' Bay Neighborhood Council v. Karlen
    Search
  9. at the environmental consequences before taking a major action. See Kleppe v. Sierra
    Search
  10. actions, and that its decision is not arbitrary or capricious. See generally Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe
    Search
  11. in individual proceedings, which are subject to review by the Commission in any event. See generally Ecology Action v. AEC
    Search
  12. findings of fact, a reviewing court must generally be at its most deferential. See, e.g., Industrial Union Dept. v. American
    Search
  13. and articulated a rational connection between the facts found and the choice made. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Page
    Search
  14. Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe
    Search
  15. of the environmental Page 462 U. S. 107 impact of a proposed action. See Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People
    Search
  16. Kleppe v. Sierra
    Search
  17. Together with No. 82-545, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission et al. v. Natural
    Search
  18. and No. 82-551, Commonwealth Edison Co. et al. v. Natural
    Search
  19. operating license, except that a hearing need be held only in contested cases. See Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural
    Search
  20. are nuclides heavier than uranium that are produced in the reactor fuel. See Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. NRC
    Search
  21. In response to Minnesota v. NRC
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court Baltimore G. & E. Co. v. NRDC
    Search
  23. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural
    Search
  24. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. NRC
    Search
  25. In Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural
    Search
  26. Weinberger v. Catholic
    Search
  27. See Stryckers' Bay Neighborhood Council v. Karlen
    Search
  28. See Kleppe v. Sierra
    Search
  29. Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe
    Search
  30. Ecology Action v. AEC
    Search
  31. Industrial Union Dept. v. American
    Search
  32. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Page
    Search
  33. See Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People
    Search
  34. See Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural
    Search
  35. See Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. NRC
    Search
  36. Minnesota v. NRC
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial