Citation network
New Mexico Vs. Mescalero Apache Tribe
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 13, 1983
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
New Mexico v. MescaleroSearch
-
Apache Tribe - 462 U.S. 324 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court New Mexico v. MescaleroSearch
-
Apache Tribe, 462 U.S. 324 (1983) New Mexico v. MescaleroSearch
-
the Tenth Circuit's judgment, 450 U.S. 1036 (1981), and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of Montana v. UnitedSearch
-
in this case is whether the State may so restrict the Tribe's exercise of its authority. Our decision in Montana v. UnitedSearch
-
Court has considered the question whether a State may assert authority over a reservation. The decision in Worcester v. GeorgiaSearch
-
U. S. 136 , 448 U. S. 142 (1980), quoting United States v. MazurieSearch
-
Washington v. ConfederatedSearch
-
U. S. 375 , 118 U. S. 381 -382 (1886), cited in United States v. WheelerSearch
-
McClanahan v. ArizonaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 333 State Tax Comm'n, 411 U. S. 164 , 411 U. S. 171 -172 (1973), quoting Williams v. LeeSearch
-
U. S. 217 , 358 U. S. 219 -220 (1959). See also Fisher v. DistrictSearch
-
nonmembers entirely or to condition their presence on the reservation is equally well established. See, e.g., Montana v. UnitedSearch
-
Merrion v. JicarillaSearch
-
a State may exercise concurrent jurisdiction over non-Indians acting on tribal reservations, see, e.g., Washington v. ConfederatedSearch
-
Moe v. SalishSearch
-
may be asserted only if not preempted by the operation of federal law. See, e.g., Ramah Navajo School Bd., Inc. v. BureauSearch
-
Central Machinery Co. v. ArizonaSearch
-
Williams v. LeeSearch
-
Warren Trading Post v. ArizonaSearch
-
Fisher v. DistrictSearch
-
Kennerly v. DistrictSearch
-
at 448 U. S. 145 . See also Ramah Navajo School Bd., supra, at 458 U. S. 845 , quoting Hines v. DavidowitzSearch
-
Montana v. UnitedSearch
-
Ramah Navajo School Bd., 458 U.S. at 458 U. S. 845 , quoting Hines v. DavidowitzSearch
-
and nonmembers must point to more than its general interest in raising revenues. See, e.g., Warren Trading Post Co. v. ArizonaSearch
-
substantial if the State can point to off-reservation effects that necessitate state intervention. Cf. Puyallup Tribe v. WashingtonSearch
-
Treaty of 1852 includes its right to regulate the use of its resources by members as well as nonmembers. In Montana v. UnitedSearch
-
a violation of federal law to enter Indian land to hunt, trap, or fish without the consent of the tribe. See Montana v. UnitedSearch
-
which has been repeatedly confirmed by federal treaties and laws and which we explicitly recognized in Montana v. UnitedSearch
-
Warren Trading Post Co. v. ArizonaSearch
-
Bracker, 448 U.S. at 448 U. S. 149 . See Fisher v. DistrictSearch
-
by the tribe or its members, in which the tribal contribution to an enterprise is de minimis. See Washington v. ConfederatedSearch
-
lands, and the State points to no specific interest concerning those that occasionally do. Unlike Puyallup Tribe v. WashingtonSearch
-
Moreover, unlike Confederated Tribes, supra, and Moe v. SalishSearch
-
Oneida Indian Nation v. CountySearch
-
Oliphant v. SuquamishSearch
-
Washington v. ConfederatedSearch
-
See Puyallup Tribe v. WashingtonSearch
-
upheld the State of Washington's authority to regulate on-reservation fishing by tribal members. Like Montana v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court New Mexico v. MescaleroSearch
-
of Montana v. UnitedSearch
-
Worcester v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Ramah Navajo School Bd., Inc. v. BureauSearch
-
Cf. Puyallup Tribe v. WashingtonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial