Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Chappell Vs. Wallace

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 13, 1983

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

39 entries 6 linked 33 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Muniz US Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1963
  2. Orloff Vs. Willoughby US Supreme Court · Mar 09, 1953
  3. Schlesinger Vs. Councilman US Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1975
  4. Parker Vs. Levy US Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1974
  5. Wilkes Vs. Dinsman US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1849
  6. Dinsman Vs. Wilkes US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1851
  7. U.S. 296 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court Chappell v. Wallace
    Search
  8. U.S. 296 (1983) Chappell v. Wallace
    Search
  9. States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed. 661 F.2d 729 (1981). The Court of Appeals assumed that Bivens v. Six
    Search
  10. tests. We granted certiorari, 459 U.S. 966 (1982), and we reverse. II This Court's holding in Bivens v. Six
    Search
  11. are present. Id. at 403 U. S. 396 . See also Carlson v. Green
    Search
  12. See Bush v. Lucas
    Search
  13. that bear on the propriety of respondents' Bivens action also formed the basis of this Court's decision in Feres v. United
    Search
  14. U. S. 150 , 374 U. S. 162 (1963), quoting United States v. Brown
    Search
  15. U. S. 110 , 348 U. S. 112 (1954). See also Parker v. Levy
    Search
  16. Stencel Aero Engineering Corp. v. United
    Search
  17. can function without strict discipline and regulation that would be unacceptable in a civilian setting. See Parker v. Levy
    Search
  18. United States v. Brown
    Search
  19. authority in this area, and the distance between military and civilian life, was summed up by the Court in Orloff v. Willoughby
    Search
  20. Only recently, we restated this principle in Rostker v. Goldberg
    Search
  21. In Gilligan v. Morgan
    Search
  22. review, and can be set aside if they are arbitrary, capricious, or not based on substantial evidence. See Grieg v. United
    Search
  23. Sanders v. United
    Search
  24. one for civilians and one for military personnel. Burns v. Wilson
    Search
  25. States, 431 U.S. at 431 U. S. 676 (MARSHALL, J., dissenting), quoting United States v. Brown
    Search
  26. to provide enlisted military personnel a Bivens -type remedy against their superior officers. See Bush v. Lucas
    Search
  27. all redress in civilian courts for constitutional wrongs suffered in the course of military service. See, e.g., Brown v. Glines
    Search
  28. Frontiero v. Page
    Search
  29. Respondents and the Court of Appeals rely on Wilkes v. Dinsman
    Search
  30. How. 89 (1849), after remand, Dinsman v. Wilkes
    Search
  31. U.S. Supreme Court Chappell v. Wallace
    Search
  32. Bivens v. Six
    Search
  33. Carlson v. Green
    Search
  34. Feres v. United
    Search
  35. See Parker v. Levy
    Search
  36. See Grieg v. United
    Search
  37. Brown v. Glines
    Search
  38. Burns v. Wilson
    Search
  39. Rostker v. Goldberg
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales