Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Simopoulos Vs. Virginia

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 15, 1983

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

27 entries 3 linked 24 unlinked
Show
  1. Mullaney Vs. Wilbur US Supreme Court · Jun 09, 1975
  2. Roe Vs. Wade US Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1973
  3. United States Vs. Vuitch US Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1971
  4. U.S. 506 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court Simopoulos v. Virginia
    Search
  5. U.S. 506 (1983) Simopoulos v. Virginia
    Search
  6. at approximately the end of the first trimester. In Akron v. Akron
    Search
  7. Health, Inc., ante p. 462 U. S. 416 , and Planned Parenthood Assn. of Kansas City, Mo., Inc. v. Ashcroft
    Search
  8. We have considered today mandatory hospitalization requirements for second trimester abortions in City of Akron v. Akron
    Search
  9. Reproductive Health, Inc., ante p. 462 U. S. 416 , and Planned Parenthood Assn. of Kansas City, Mo., Inc. v. Ashcroft
    Search
  10. i) the State failed to meet its burden of alleging necessity in the indictment, as required by United States v. Vuitch
    Search
  11. and (ii) the prosecution failed to meet its burden of persuasion, as required by Patterson v. New
    Search
  12. the defendant the burden of going forward with evidence on an affirmative defense is normally permissible. See Engle v. Isaac
    Search
  13. in City of Akron, ante at 462 U. S. 431 -432, and Planned Parenthood Assn. of Kansas City, Mo., Inc. v. Ashcroft
    Search
  14. concurring in the judgment. I agree with the Court's treatment of the appellant's arguments based on United States v. Vuitch
    Search
  15. U. S. 62 (1971), Page 462 U. S. 520 and Patterson v. New
    Search
  16. I concur in the judgment of the Court insofar as it affirms the conviction. For reasons stated in my dissent in Akron v Akron
    Search
  17. on the decision to undergo an abortion. JUSTICE STEVENS, dissenting. Prior to this Court's decision in Roe v. Wade
    Search
  18. General Assembly did not want to make any greater change in its law than it believed necessary to comply with Roe v. Wade
    Search
  19. performed in a full-service, acute care hospital. Our decision today in City of Page 462 U. S. 522 Akron v. Akron
    Search
  20. U.S. Supreme Court Simopoulos v. Virginia
    Search
  21. In Akron v. Akron
    Search
  22. and Planned Parenthood Assn. of Kansas City, Mo., Inc. v. Ashcroft
    Search
  23. City of Akron v. Akron
    Search
  24. Patterson v. New
    Search
  25. See Engle v. Isaac
    Search
  26. and Patterson v. New
    Search
  27. Akron v. Akron
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales