Citation network
United States Vs. Place
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 20, 1983
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 696 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. PlaceSearch
-
U.S. 696 (1983) United States v. PlaceSearch
-
the prolonged seizure of respondent's luggage exceeded the limits of the type of investigative stop permitted by Terry v. OhioSearch
-
The District Court denied the motion. Page 462 U. S. 700 Applying the standard of Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Marron v. UnitedSearch
-
circumstances demand it or some other recognized exception to the warrant requirement is present. See, e.g., Arkansas v. SandersSearch
-
Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
Payton v. NewSearch
-
Page 462 U. S. 702 warrant may be obtained outweighs the interest in possession. See also G. M. Leasing Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
quickly confirm or dispel the authorities' suspicion. Specifically, we are asked to apply the principles of Terry v. OhioSearch
-
That implicit proposition was embraced openly in Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
s tip that the suspect was carrying Page 462 U. S. 703 narcotics and a concealed weapon. See also Michigan v. SummersSearch
-
in seizing the luggage briefly to pursue further investigation is substantial. We agree. As observed in United States v. MendenhallSearch
-
U.S. at 392 U. S. 22 . Similarly, in Michigan v. SummersSearch
-
U.S. at 452 U. S. 702 -703. Cf. Florida v. RoyerSearch
-
it to the sniff test -- no matter how brief -- could not be justified on less than probable cause. See Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
of seizures longer than the momentary ones involved in Terry, Adams, and Brignoni-Ponce, see Michigan v. SummersSearch
-
for the prolonged 90-minute period involved here and cannot do so on the facts presented by this case. See Dunaway v. NewSearch
-
Respondent Place cross-petitioned in this Court on the issue of reasonable suspicion, and we denied certiorari. Place v. UnitedSearch
-
the search. Id. at 442 U. S. 766 . That holding was not affected by our recent decision in United States v. RossSearch
-
U. S. 544 , 446 U. S. 561 -562 (1980). See Florida v. RoyerSearch
-
One need only compare the facts of this case with those in United States v. VanSearch
-
Cf. Florida v. RoyerSearch
-
stop of respondent under Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Street v. NewSearch
-
the exception to the Fourth Amendment's probable cause requirement created by Terry and its progeny. See Florida v. RoyerSearch
-
Id. at 392 U. S. 21 , quoting Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
U.S. at 392 U. S. 30 . In Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
Ibid. In United States v. Brignoni-PonceSearch
-
U.S. at 422 U. S. 881 -882. See also Page 462 U. S. 714 Ybarra v. IllinoisSearch
-
Dunaway v. NewSearch
-
the police with a commission to employ whatever investigative techniques they deem appropriate. As I stated in Florida v. RoyerSearch
-
U.S. at 460 U. S. 510 (concurring in result), quoting Dunaway v. NewSearch
-
respects, the Court's opinion in this case can be seen as the logical successor of the plurality opinion in Florida v. RoyerSearch
-
as well as people from unreasonable searches and seizures. In this regard, JUSTICE STEVENS pointed out in Texas v. BrownSearch
-
Fourth Amendment interest. For this reason, seizures of property must be based on probable cause. See Colorado v. BannisterSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. PlaceSearch
-
Terry v. OhioSearch
-
of Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Marron v. UnitedSearch
-
Arkansas v. SandersSearch
-
G. M. Leasing Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
See Terry v. OhioSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial