Citation network
illinois Vs. Lafayette
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 20, 1983
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 640 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court Illinois v. LafayetteSearch
-
U.S. 640 (1983) Illinois v. LafayetteSearch
-
was held at which the State argued that the search of the shoulder bag was a valid inventory search under South Dakota v. OppermanSearch
-
not a valid inventory of respondent's belongings. It purported to distinguish Page 462 U. S. 643 South Dakota v. OppermanSearch
-
that the inventory search constitutes a well-defined exception to the warrant requirement. See South Dakota v. OppermanSearch
-
supra. The Illinois court and respondent rely on United States v. ChadwickSearch
-
U. S. 1 (1977), and Arkansas v. SandersSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
We have held that, immediately upon arrest, an officer may lawfully search the person of an arrestee, United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
he may also search the area within the arrestee's immediate control, Chimel v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U. S. 752 (1969). We explained the basis for this doctrine in United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
a prisoner's clothes before confining him, although that step would be rare. This was made clear in United States v. EdwardsSearch
-
to protect against such risks arises independently of a particular officer's subjective concerns. See United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
s shoulder bag prior to his incarceration. Our prior cases amply support this conclusion. In South Dakota v. OppermanSearch
-
means. In Cady v. DombrowskiSearch
-
Id. at 413 U. S. 447 . See also United States v. Martinez-FuerteSearch
-
in deciding which containers or items may be searched and which must be sealed as a unit. Only recently, in New York v. BeltonSearch
-
Id. at 453 U. S. 458 , quoting Dunaway v. NewSearch
-
York, 442 U. S. 200 , 442 U. S. 213 -214 (1979). See also United States v. RossSearch
-
See also United States v. EdwardsSearch
-
U. S. 800 (1974). In that case, we addressed Cooper v. CaliforniaSearch
-
to arrest must be justified by a need to remove weapons or prevent the destruction of evidence. See United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
such a concern could not have justified the further step of searching the bag following its seizure. Cf. United States v. ChadwickSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Illinois v. LafayetteSearch
-
See South Dakota v. OppermanSearch
-
and Arkansas v. SandersSearch
-
United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
See United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
In South Dakota v. OppermanSearch
-
In Cady v. DombrowskiSearch
-
Dunaway v. NewSearch
-
Cooper v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Cf. United States v. ChadwickSearch
-
United States v. RossSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial