Citation network
Brown Vs. Thomson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 22, 1983
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 835 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court Brown v. ThomsonSearch
-
U.S. 835 (1983) Brown v. ThomsonSearch
-
two senators -- so far departed from the principle of population equality that it was unconstitutional. Schaefer v. ThomsonSearch
-
Wyo.1964), supplemented, Page 462 U. S. 838 251 F.Supp. 450 (1965), aff'd, sub nom. Harrison v. SchaeferSearch
-
districts gaining a representative and two districts losing a representative because of population shifts. Thompson v. ThomsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
jurisdiction, 459 U.S. 819 (1982), and now affirm. Page 462 U. S. 842 II A In Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
Id. at 377 U. S. 577 . See Gaffney v. CummingsSearch
-
falls within this category of minor deviations. See, e.g., Connor v. FinchSearch
-
however, creates a prima facie case of discrimination, and therefore must be justified by the State. See Swann v. AdamsSearch
-
ensuring that each county has one representative is supported by substantial and legitimate state concerns. In Abate v. MundtSearch
-
See Mahan v. HowellSearch
-
supra, at 410 U. S. 329 . Indeed, the Court in Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
that population deviations are no greater than necessary to preserve counties as representative districts. See Mahan v. HowellSearch
-
whereas Teton County, the least populous county in the State, had one senator for its 3,062 people. See Schaefer v. ThomsonSearch
-
population equality were the result of a good faith application of legitimate districting criteria. See, e.g., Chapman v. MeierSearch
-
U.S. at 377 U. S. 581 . See also Connor v. FinchSearch
-
of the population, had six senators. See Schaefer v. ThomsonSearch
-
the other house's apportionment as well, we never have held that a court is required to do so. For example, in Gaffney v. CummingsSearch
-
JUSTICE O'CONNOR, with whom JUSTICE STEVENS joins, concurring. By its decisions today in this case and in Karcher v. DaggettSearch
-
creates a prima facie case of discrimination. See, e.g., Connor v. FinchSearch
-
U. S. 407 , 431 U. S. 418 (1977). Moreover, in Mahan v. HowellSearch
-
of the Constitution provides the governing standard. White v. RegesterSearch
-
Roman, supra, at 377 U. S. 710 . See Mahan v. HowellSearch
-
deviations from equality, it can hardly be said that the larger deviations advance the policy. See, e.g., Kilgarlin v. HillSearch
-
which Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
U.S. at 410 U. S. 329 . See also Abate v. MundtSearch
-
exceptionally perverse results. We confronted an analogous situation in Maryland Committee for Fair Representation v. TawesSearch
-
Id. at 377 U. S. 673 . Accord, Lucas v. ColoradoSearch
-
we have been substantially more demanding with respect to apportionment of federal congressional districts. Mahan v. HowellSearch
-
U. S. 315 , 410 U. S. 320 -325 (1973). See generally Karcher v. DaggettSearch
-
Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
Cf. Swann v. AdamsSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Brown v. ThomsonSearch
-
Schaefer v. ThomsonSearch
-
Thompson v. ThomsonSearch
-
II A In Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
See Gaffney v. CummingsSearch
-
the State. See Swann v. AdamsSearch
-
In Abate v. MundtSearch
-
See Schaefer v. ThomsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial