Citation network
United States Vs. Mitchell
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 27, 1983
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 206 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. MitchellSearch
-
U.S. 206 (1983) United States v. MitchellSearch
-
U. S. 211 -219. (b) In contrast to the bare trust created by the General Allotment Act, United States v. MitchellSearch
-
the character of lands to be set apart for the Indians was not restricted by the General Allotment Act. United States v. PayneSearch
-
control over the harvesting of Indian timber. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSearch
-
properly, and thereby provided the necessary authority for recovery of damages against the United States. Mitchell v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
States, 219 Ct.Cl. 95, 591 F.2d 1300 (1979) (en banc). In United States v. MitchellSearch
-
of the United States to be sued eo nomine for the classes of claims described in the Act. See, e.g., Schillinger v. UnitedSearch
-
Belknap v. SchildSearch
-
Dooley v. UnitedSearch
-
Reid v. UnitedSearch
-
Dalehite v. UnitedSearch
-
Soriano v. UnitedSearch
-
Court explicitly stated that the Tucker Act effects a waiver of sovereign immunity. Army Air Force Exchange Service v. SheehanSearch
-
Hatzlachh Supply Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
between claims founded upon contracts and claims founded upon other specified sources of law. In United States v. TestanSearch
-
U. S. 392 , 424 U. S. 398 , 424 U. S. 400 (1976), and in United States v. MitchellSearch
-
supra, at 445 U. S. 538 , quoting United States v. TestanSearch
-
cognizable under the Tucker Act. The claim must be one for money damages against the United States, see United States v. KingSearch
-
supra, at 424 U. S. 400 , quoting Eastport S.S. Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
For example, in United States v. TestanSearch
-
it does not apply to wrongful classifications. Id. at 424 U. S. 405 . Similarly, in United States v. MitchellSearch
-
scope of the Tucker Act, this Court has not lightly inferred the United States' consent to suit. See United States v. KingSearch
-
that the Act does not reach claims based on contracts implied in law, as opposed to those implied in fact. Merritt v. UnitedSearch
-
immunity, nor need they be construed in the manner appropriate to waivers of sovereign immunity. See United States v. EmerySearch
-
United States v. AetnaSearch
-
Casualty & Surety Co., 338 U. S. 366 , 338 U. S. 383 (1949), quoting Anderson v. JohnSearch
-
Cong.Rec. 11730 (1934). See United States v. AndersonSearch
-
responsibilities of the Federal Government in managing the harvesting of Indian timber. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSearch
-
Page 463 U. S. 224 B In United States v. MitchellSearch
-
Navajo Tribe of Indians v. UnitedSearch
-
Seminole Nation v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 296 (1942). This principle has long dominated the Government's dealings with Indians. United States v. MasonSearch
-
Minnesota v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. ShoshoneSearch
-
Quinault Allottee Assn. v. UnitedSearch
-
See Halbert v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. WashingtonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. MitchellSearch
-
the General Allotment Act, United States v. MitchellSearch
-
the General Allotment Act. United States v. PayneSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial