Citation network
Rice Vs. Rehner
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jul 01, 1983
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 713 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court Rice v. RehnerSearch
-
U.S. 713 (1983) Rice v. RehnerSearch
-
Williams v. LeeSearch
-
determining whether state regulation of activities in Indian country is preempted have not been static. In Worcester v. GeorgiaSearch
-
McClanahan v. ArizonaSearch
-
Bracker, supra, at 448 U. S. 144 (quoting Moe v. SalishSearch
-
Washington v. ConfederatedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Indian Law)). Repeal by implication of an established tradition of immunity or self-governance is disfavored. Bryan v. ItascaSearch
-
this aspect of self-governance. See Brief for Respondent 63-74. Rehner relies on our statement in United States v. MazurieSearch
-
Wlliams v. LeeSearch
-
and this interest is independent of the authority conferred on the States by the Twenty-first Amendment. Crowley v. ChristensenSearch
-
New Mexico v. MescaleroSearch
-
from the rule against construing legislation to repeal by implication some aspect of tribal self-government. See Bryan v. ItascaSearch
-
Bowsher v. MerckSearch
-
Co., 460 U. S. 824 , 460 U. S. 832 (1983) (quoting North Haven Board of Education v. BellSearch
-
with the Federal Government in this area. Early administrative practice and our prior decision in United States v. MazurieSearch
-
DeCoteau v. DistrictSearch
-
County Court, 420 U. S. 425 , 420 U. S. 447 (1975). See also Andrus v. GloverSearch
-
Warren Trading Post Co. v. ArizonaSearch
-
Ninth Circuit then scheduled argument en banc for all three cases. The companion cases were Muckleshoot Indian Tribe v. WashingtonSearch
-
No. 79-4403, and Tulalip Tribes v. WashingtonSearch
-
below in this case. The court remanded these two companion cases to the District Court in the light of Washington v. ConfederatedSearch
-
In Moe v. SalishSearch
-
Id. at 425 U. S. 475 -476 (quoting Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSearch
-
State v. RorvickSearch
-
State v. LindseySearch
-
Dagan v. StateSearch
-
State v. JusticeSearch
-
State v. MamlockSearch
-
People v. GebhardSearch
-
Tate v. StateSearch
-
State v. WiseSearch
-
People v. BraySearch
-
Territory v. GuyottSearch
-
Territory v. ColemanSearch
-
emphasis in original). As support for this proposition, JUSTICE BLACKMUN relies on Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc. v. BureauSearch
-
of Revenue of New Mexico, 458 U. S. 832 (1982), Moe v. SalishSearch
-
Kootenai Tribes, 425 U. S. 463 (1976), and Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSearch
-
we note that the 1971 opinion of the Solicitor appears to be based on his view that, in Warren Trading Post Co. v. ArizonaSearch
-
State Tax Comm'n, 411 U. S. 164 , 411 U. S. 174 (1973) (quoting Carpenter v. ShawSearch
-
delegated the authority that we now find that it so delegated. In Organized Village of Kake v. EganSearch
-
In United States v. MazurieSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial